Quote (Goomshill @ Feb 5 2022 11:01am)
So did it fall upon the police at the scene to declare they would refuse to do their jobs? This was a lawful search warrant, signed by a judge. It was the product of an institution of sociologists, judges, boards of review, politicians and their executive staff, all who created a system where no-knock search warrants were legal and enforceable despite the fact they clearly value the risk of losing evidence over the risk of losing lives. None of those administrators or bureaucrats ever took a stand that would cost them their jobs if they refused to enforce a lawful, binding warrant. So it falls on the cops standing outside the door to make the moral decision that they'll sacrifice their own careers rather than become responsible for the risks hoisted upon them by a broken system?
Maybe some on both sides of the aisle will be sated by the blood sacrifice of another officer, but I see a broken system and its the system that needs fixing. Its the same criminal justice system that brought us 'recidivist felon on his 30th conviction being given his 30th suspended sentence' and 'send someone to prison for the rest of their life for murder even if they provably did not cause a death'. They were searching for evidence that prosecutors would have completely disregarded anyway. Its the same political culture that made the South Education Center in Richfield respond to the crime wave by removing its metal detectors and police from campus last year, only to have students walking around with guns on campus and shooting each other to death this year. Its the reason Mayor Frey's commission on criminal justice reform was itself a board filled with criminals like the fake charity that defrauded the government out of millions in fake meal programs for children. Its the reason he got to campaign on having banned no-knock warrants without banning no-knock warrants.
What would happen to the officers who refused to serve a lawful search warrant, signed by a judge? What would happen to the officers who didn't shoot first when a startled man draws a gun on them in the dark and chaotic scene? Life-destroying consequences. What would happen to policy makers and guideline commissioners and their staff and analysts and judges who corrupt the system, jeopardize our public safety and sweep their fraud under the rug? Nothing. They'll champion the cause of the folks who chant Amir Locke's name and march so righteously aggrieved. Less than nothing, it will accelerate the poison they've introduced into the system and secure their reelection.
It's a question of liability. Everyone trying to pass it around like hot potato. Not just in law enforcement.
Individual police decisions are shouldered by the whole department which has its pros and cons but it dramatically shifts the attitude. Imagine if individuals were liable, would that cop be as trigger happy? Hell no
No knock search warrants while questionable are not the main problem. The training of when to shoot should be drastically revised. Not only that but the liability of making a wrong/careless call needs to be felt among the ranks.
Public servants need to have a greater accountability especially those who hold guns