It is all just superficial numbers to me at this point. I have seen what I need to see. I had Covid over a year ago. Sucked but whatever everybody gets sick right? Now we find out the cdc doesn’t even officially study natural infection in relation to reinfection, or reinfection in relation to the vaccine.

It is just all so irrelevant to me at this point. We can argue over numbers we can argue which statistics are important and which are not, it doesn’t change one thing. The conversations should be happening at high levels of our government and they are not.

I believe it was Jim Jordan who recently pointed out what a joke Covid talks are in DC. Not anywhere near the first but the most recent in my memory. I am paraphrasing here but basically the doctors who present information are being shut down by the lawyers in the government. It is a fucking joke.

This post was edited by WickedDarkJuggalos on Nov 28 2021 02:44am

Yes our country is fukt in that regard.
Meanwhile you have countries like Germany that don’t require vaccination if you can prove you’ve had covid and the antibodies . Aka utilizing real science lol USA pretends our bodies natural immunity is worthless compared to their unstudied vax

This is a hasty conclusion IMO. I doubt there's enough evidence to conclude with any degree of confidence that it's less deadly. I'm seeing conflicting results when I search, so we're just going to have to wait and see.

Sioux, sioux, sioux

💉💉💉║█║▌🍄




https://patents.justia.com/inventor/luc-montagnier?page=2

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/556291

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020–2021_global_chip_shortage

Neat. You've horribly misunderstood what DNA barcoding is but go on. This is great.

The quote from the South African doctor has been badly misconstrued. She didn't say that all omicron infections are mild, she said that the infections she has seen so far have been mild - and the sample only contained young people.
It's the equivalent of someone in February 2020 seeing a couple dozen of cases of the ancestral Wuhan strain in young people and everyone (incorrectly) concludes that "it's just a cold".

Fact is that we don't know yet if omicron will cause more or less severe cases when let loose on an elderly, fat-as-fuck Western population.




This is the long-term trend for zoonoses because viruses tend to adapt to their new host over time - but in the short run, the there is little evolutionary pressure for a virus to become less virulent when the most infectious period is 4-5 days post infection and deaths typically occur much later, after 10-20 days (untreated).

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Nov 28 2021 04:21am

What’s annoying is all the front pages of multiple browsers being ridden with low quality research or opinionated news articles when trying to actually conduct research on the matter lol. Takes a fricken hour just to find unbiased research over anything viral or covid related these days.

Finding the article on WHO saying it’s a mild variant is now long lost and it was just a few days ago

I saw the WHOs announcement a few days ago calling it a variant of interest but nothing about it being a milder variant. I think you got duped.

They never classified it as a variant of interest, it was immediately labelled a variant of concern.

At a biological level, why would it be less deadly? Whats the mechanism of action to change its deadliness? It has significant alterations to the spike protein, which if anything most likely point to it resisting vaccines, but what more conclusions can we draw at a biological level?