Quote (lolkggz @ Nov 4 2021 01:29pm)
Take a completely unbiased person.
Show them the surroundings and enviroment.
Then show them the air footage of the parking ambush by Rosenbaum, then chase.
Ask them who is the person in danger here please point them out.
I'll bet you 99% of them point to Kyle.
Actually remove all doubt, just show them the air footage and ask them who's in danger.
Thats it.
I thought this would easily go the way of Kyle because if you simply ask most of the jurors to be in the shoes of Kyle and ask them if their response had been different, most would have likely used the weapon in defence, I think (obviously we don't know yet what they think)
Where most of us who are deemed the opposition for whatever reason said the defence will have to work in showing that Kyle was not there under malicious intent and proving that it was actually self-defence even though he willingly put himself in a dangerous situation and that is also what most of us have said the prosecution would go after, or thought they would anyway.
I think most of us are on the same page that his shots were defensive in nature.
This post was edited by SBD on Nov 4 2021 02:01pm