Theres a lot of things im willing to listen, but if you still have your tinfoil hat on Muh Russia, its just not an opinion worth considering.

It was worth considering in 2016 when there was circumstancial evidence, but the Steel Dossier and Obamagate just disproved it all

I wouldn't read any of the three links provided, either.

guy you are taking your talking points directly from trump.

the guy has literally spent the last 4 years installing loyalists to skew any type of bad information against him. he is the #1 source of fake news because he is fake.

you talk about verifying information sources and being critical yet all you do is spout trump nonsense which is amplified by even bigger idiots.

i mean there was some collusion-lite going on, but to call it treason, spend millions investigating, and impeach over was an overreach to be sure.

frankly im surprised lefties still bring it up being that all that energy basically got a few lackies locked up that trump might grant clemency to.

shit, flynn basically got in trouble for talking to people in the transition period lol.

dems spent 3 years focused on impeaching rather than winning 2020, rushed together a mainstage that was bernie and mostly shit otherwise, and got bailed out by a pandemic and trumps general ineptitude.

john bolton admitted basically why trump was impeached but said it focused on only ukraine and clearly indicated that trump was doing this in other countries as well. specifically where he had business interests/relationships. i.e SA, turkey etc.

lets be honest dude, the entire thing was a sham becasue the insane amount of obstruction. they got bill clinton to testify to a grand jury about a fucking blow job and trump has his lackies running over the world trying to announce bogus investigations into a politcal opponent he knew he would lose to.

where exactly doesnt trump have business interests?

he's a conman and 2nd rate real estate developer, and hes con'd people world wide and has real estate in almost every country.

bill clinton shouldnt have gotten impeached, either. impeachment without high level crimes that you can prove BEFORE impeachment to a realistic degree is a mistake, and a drain on the american tax payer.

it costs a massive amount of cash, and hijacks an already underperforming legislature. for what? flynn and manafort in club med prisons?

there's a reason Pelosi was so hesitant. it made a martyr out of trump either way and put all of the focus on him, and he walked away unscathed largely.

baseless claim fisa warrant applications arent illegal, they're political loopholes. so is obstructing as the potus, because its not a crime that he can be removed over. both are bad, neither should have happened, and i dont give a shit which is worse with a bill that big on the tax payers dime.

yeah manafort not paying personal income taxes in 2009 was clearly proof of “obstruction” and “hacking the election” in 2016 lmao

re: flynn - this is exactly what harris/biden people are doing now. hope there is consistency in the railroading

that’s probably one reason why biden is floating not investigating Trump at all if he ends up in office

This post was edited by excellence on Nov 18 2020 10:35am

Obama didn't investigate the war crimes of his predecessor and didnt do shit to prosecute the illegal activity that crashed the economy.

So I expect Biden to behave in much the same way

war crimes? in what war is GWB a criminal? In the battle for our affections?

Lindsay Graham on Trump: