Quote (Black XistenZ @ Feb 3 2020 06:00am)
- a lack of positive and an abundance of negative examples in their neighborhood and community
- lack of education
- lower average IQ
in this order.
The more research I do into the subject the more I am skeptical of IQ's application in any but the most extreme circumstances. Like, yeah, a person with 60 is gonna be slower than a person with an average score, but beyond super obvious differences I don't think there's much meaning behind IQ.
I'm gonna list a few things that have made me increasingly skeptical of the correlations between IQ and success or good decision making
1. You can't really differentiate the genetic component of IQ heritability with it's environmental factors. The best studies, being twin studies, still have a lot of issues behind them.
2. IQ has increasingly been shown to be significantly variable with external factors, such as financial instability, food instability, training at test taking, home stress, etc.
3. The fact that IQ isn't correlated alone with positive outcomes, but merely facilitates other qualities in success, which can then be explained by simply having those other qualities and then tending to be in a more secure environment, etc. which means you just had an advantage to begin with.
Anyway, I'm not an expert, but the more I look into it the more IQ as a concept seems to not be as useful as most people who do a little research think it is. I recently learned that the WW2 American military "IQ Test" was in fact not an IQ test by any means and has just been extrapolated post-hoc to infer IQ scores. Utter garbage methodology. Then I learned that a lot of things like this actually came from some fairly right-wing authors who totally misrepresented the state of literature on IQ to make far-right policy proposals and their book just happened to make it into the public zeitgeist.
This post was edited by Thor123422 on Feb 3 2020 08:56am