Quote (thesnipa @ 15 Jan 2020 09:15)
I make overarching decisions based on morals. if i had the moral stand that laws should prevent people from financially "taking advantage" of the poor in the context you're using it in, i'd be against soda, cigarettes, check into cash, etc.
I actually believe that cash checking places should be banned, or at least heavily restricted in their profit margins. but that's because i feel the abuse is far worse in that industry than people who own rental properties.
generally my crux with your stand is that you stated openly no one should be allowed to own 2 family homes. 2? you're all the way down to 2? that's just a part time job, not some serious case of abuse. if it's 10? 20? or even 5 houses? i get that. that landlord isnt maintaining shit right im sure. but 2?
i lived in a duplex where the owner lived next door. he just wanted to control who his neighbors were and make a small amount of money as a side job. but that guy is evil?
there we agree entirely.
i can trust duff to post a topic that leads to the usual suspects here and some passerbys spewing the usual anti-liberty, “all people except me are evil” self-righteous bullshit
here we’ve seen:
people who provide rental opportunities provide no value
there needs to be a cap of ten nah fuck it, two homes anyone can own
it is immoral to own homes
problems in a few coastal cities require federal government intervention
ownership should be banned
capitalism is evil
blah blah some nonsense personal anecdotes thrown in
same old story
This post was edited by excellence on Jan 15 2020 08:25am