Investigation concluded. Investment in collusion confirmed.

Well the obstruction bit seemed to be a persistent theme but going after a president for that might not be good for the usa I'd think.

so as far as knowing what facebook groups they made and how the riled people up, that was all pretty well understood before Mueller ever even got the call. and leveraging people in govt and campaigns is KGB era known stuff.

and by the time you get around to really writing laws on social media responsibilities for this stuff the game has changed and they wouldnt do the same thing the same way.

i tend to agree laying it all out was important, but i'd have preferred a TIMES article to a multi million/billion dollar tax payer circus. especially when the circus veered WAY off course.

funny how quickly that changed from 'that's not what the word means, you're english is bad' to 'w-w-well acktshually they ARE comparable'. next time consult your dictionary before you try to lecture people.




obviously you focus on the similarities, completely ignoring the massive differences, in order to justify that moronic take, but that hackery doesn't change the FACTS about the huge amount of wrongdoing uncovered by the mueller investigation - no matter how hard you're trying to kellyanne your way out of this, creek boy.

let's revisit the timeline shall we?

i compared two federal criminal investigations, my opinion is that they're quite similar.

you said they aren't comparable (because you read it somewhere and liked how it sounded). when clearly they are comparable, even if they're not as similar as my opinion suggests.

i pointed out to you that's not what comparable means, you posted a definition agreeing with me. i then used your definition to make another comparison, and you suggested i wasnt using your definition, so i did it again but this time repeating enough words in it that even you should be able to get what i'm doing.

now here you are, not admitting you goofed on what comparable means, lying about me shifting the goal posts because you still dont get English very well.

that isn't what 'comparable means', and they are comparable. both federal investigations, both with congressional hearings for the results, neither hit its mark. how exactly are those not comparisons again?

one was a man, one was a woman. one carried out by the DNC one by the GOP. one with a DNC potus, one with a GOP potus, both by the out of power party. one involved smashed hard drives, one involved stupidly taken meetings with russian officials. you can also compare things that are not similar, funny enough. one woman might look at me and then at you and make some harsh comparisons.

This post was edited by thesnipa on Jul 24 2019 01:49pm

you're again trying to portray an obvious difference of opinion as me not understanding what 'comparable' means even though i specifically posted the definition of it, which makes perfect sense in the context i used it in and considering my opinion. repeating your pathetic little walkback won't make that magically disappear. you were caught trying to arrogantly lecture a non-native speaker, and exposed your own questionable grasp of the term doing so. that's embarrassing for sure, but i would not even have mentioned it, had you just focused on the disagreement in our evaluation rather than trying to make a silly personal attack. you unsurprisingly couldn't help your petty self though, so stop bitching now, and don't try to rewrite history just because you were humiliated.

the important thing here is that no, the mueller report is NOT "the liberal's benghazi" - it details many cases of significant wrongdoing, some just barely short of criminal acts, others clearly worthy of charging ANY person not protected by the highly controversial OLC guideline. there's nothing even close to that in the benghazi report. how someone can not acknowledge that and still claim they are not like a cultist in that regard, is mindblowing...


edit: she might compare us and think you're a bit of a creek boy...

This post was edited by fender on Jul 24 2019 02:04pm

I don't expect you to know this, but it wasn't Mueller's job to exonerate. It was his job to indict or not indict.

Here we are...... That's how the legal system works. He must determine guilt, not determine innocence......

Read a book.

You know what. i bet all those hard drives smashed themselves up. life is just like D2, hammers fly around in the air sometimes and if a computer gets in the way that happens to contain a lot of damaging material to go along with proven sent classified material, well that's none of my business.

HRC walking free despite having tangible evidence on her. Trump walking free despite having tangible evidence on him.

please write me another essay about how they're not comparable without even mentioning HRC or the Benghazi investigation (that shows you know what a comparison is quite well) while also spending the first half talking about me. i like when people talk about me especially.

This post was edited by thesnipa on Jul 24 2019 02:06pm

I think I dislike Mike Gaetz more than Trump.

unironic 'b-b-but benghaaazi!'... nice. sorry, but not even close. get that idiotic fox news talking point out of here, you hack...