Quote (Black XistenZ @ Nov 25 2018 04:02pm)
E-XAC-T-LY!!!!
and this one of the main reasons why democratic, free, capitalistic societies are inherently superior to socialist systems: in a democratic, free, market-based system, power is more evenly distributed, and corrupt politicians can more easily be removed from office. in such a system, it takes corruption to be a lot more widespread to bring down the system itself.
by contrast, in socialist systems, there is little to no democratic control of the leaders, there is no competition between individuals, products and ideas to keep things in check, and a disproportionate amount of power and control lies with the leadership of the ruling, socialist party. socialism only works in undemocratic, unfree systems - and in such a system, it only takes a handful of people (the leadership of the communist/socialist unity party) to be corrupted to drag the entire country down.
You don't get the point, or maybe you're just trying to turn it into a strawman.
Socialism inherently does not lead to a lack of democracy, and many democracies around the world are successfully maintaining/implementing certain socialist ideas. Lack of democracy stems entirely from corruption, which is possible in any type of political system.
Quote (EndlessSky @ Nov 25 2018 04:21pm)
You dont need corruption. Socialism fails based on its own lack of merit alone.
And similarly, capitalism fails based on how it encourages exploitation. The only thing that works is a decent balance of the two.
This post was edited by Leevee on Nov 25 2018 09:00am