d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > More Drama In The Trump Reality Show
Prev18910111220Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 63,033
Joined: Jul 15 2005
Gold: 152.00
May 17 2017 03:22pm
Quote (excellence @ May 17 2017 05:01pm)
https://kek.gg/i/tt4Gd.png

[√] winning [ ] not winning

reminds me to remind us of the other successful even that occurred in 2016 which some argued would lead to the end of all the times

https://kek.gg/i/5G6kz_.png

[√] winning [ ] not winning


>taking credit for a rise before he was even president that everyone already predicted

>#justtrumpsupporterthings

p.s. are those numbers inflation adjusted?

This post was edited by Voyaging on May 17 2017 03:24pm
Member
Posts: 53,340
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
May 17 2017 03:30pm
Quote (Voyaging @ 17 May 2017 17:22)
>taking credit for a rise before he was even president that everyone already predicted

>#justtrumpsupporterthings

uh what?
why go and create #fakenews like that when we all know many predicted a stock market fall, including buzzfeed 2.0

http://money.cnn.com/2016/10/24/investing/stocks-donald-trump-hillary-clinton/ - A Trump win would sink stocks. What about Clinton?
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/donald-trump-wall-street-effect-markets-230164 - Economists: A Trump win would tank the markets
http://fortune.com/2016/11/08/donald-trump-stocks-crash/ - A Huge Hedge Fund Says Stocks Will Crash if Donald Trump Wins
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/the-stock-market-could-crash-if-donald-trump-is-elected-2016-10-31 - The stock market could crash if Donald Trump is elected president
http://www.investors.com/news/fbi-reveals-more-evidence-that-stocks-will-fall-if-trump-wins/ - FBI Reveals More Evidence That Stocks Will Fall If Trump Wins
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/01/business/dealbook/what-happens-to-the-markets-if-donald-trump-wins.html - What Happens to the Markets if Donald Trump Wins?..."The conventional wisdom is that, right off the bat, the stock market would fall precipitously."
http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/tom-blumer/2016/11/10/ny-timess-paul-krugman-trump-wins-markets-will-never-recover - NY Times's Paul Krugman, As Trump Wins: Markets Will 'Never' Recover
http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/2016/09/06/Mark-Cuban-Stocks-Will-Crash-if-Trump-Wins - Mark Cuban: Stocks Will Crash if Trump Wins


luckily for good hard-working Americans who voted for and support Trump, our confidence was fully expressed once his election was confirmed and has ever since B)
Member
Posts: 39,357
Joined: Feb 14 2007
Gold: 2,009.99
May 17 2017 03:57pm
Quote (excellence @ May 17 2017 10:03am)
IgoSoHard? seems that he worships God, and calling God a liar is blasphemy :(

reported, btw.


:rolleyes:

I admittedly have the dumbest name on here, the unfortunate decision of a drunken fool 10 years (crazy) ago. You can call me Lando, mate

Quote (thesnipa @ May 17 2017 11:52am)
this is all fear mongering. the greatest threat to the US is sugar, fat, guns, botulism, etc. all greater risks to the loss of human life.

if this was voyaging's general statement, that gun violence among other things (such as bad foods), pose a much larger number of deaths, than he was correct and that statement shouldn't be compared to his most famous "i'm so sick" quote. People just look past the actual body count because "ISIS goal is to wipe us out", whereas my goal to tongue punch Kate Upton is never taken too seriously.

I mean, we have about 5,000 people killed per year just by food poisoning, let alone those killed by cardiac arrest from a poor diet or lung/mouth cancer from tobacco products. the only reason to take ISIS's pledge to wipe out the US seriously is a heavy dose of illogical fear, they're nothing but a fly to a horse.



it's not hard for an honest person looking to pragmatically identify risks to life rather than risks to pride or a sense of safety.


Yeah, sugar, fat, alcohol, cigarettes all take more American lives than ISIS. Grass is green. The difference is those things aren't making the cognitive decision to kill people, it's a direct result of over-consumption. If people stopped smoking cigs, death by cig-related deaths would come to a screeching halt. The same thing can't be applied to ISIS. They're actively engaged in killing as many non-believers as possible. Nothing we do is ever going to stop their ideology. That's why they're a threat. Do they have as big of an impact on deaths in America as alcohol or cigarettes ? Of course not man. However it's foolish to dismiss ISIS because of that, just like its foolish to claim the NRA is the biggest terror organization on the planet. That was more or less my point snipa, not to say ISIS has any real chance to topple the U.S, just that they're a real entity out there that is bent on causing terror throughout the world. I for one, don't see the NRA in the same light.
Member
Posts: 63,033
Joined: Jul 15 2005
Gold: 152.00
May 17 2017 04:27pm
Quote (excellence @ May 17 2017 05:30pm)
uh what?
why go and create #fakenews like that when we all know many predicted a stock market fall, including buzzfeed 2.0

http://money.cnn.com/2016/10/24/investing/stocks-donald-trump-hillary-clinton/ - A Trump win would sink stocks. What about Clinton?
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/donald-trump-wall-street-effect-markets-230164 - Economists: A Trump win would tank the markets
http://fortune.com/2016/11/08/donald-trump-stocks-crash/ - A Huge Hedge Fund Says Stocks Will Crash if Donald Trump Wins
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/the-stock-market-could-crash-if-donald-trump-is-elected-2016-10-31 - The stock market could crash if Donald Trump is elected president
http://www.investors.com/news/fbi-reveals-more-evidence-that-stocks-will-fall-if-trump-wins/ - FBI Reveals More Evidence That Stocks Will Fall If Trump Wins
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/01/business/dealbook/what-happens-to-the-markets-if-donald-trump-wins.html - What Happens to the Markets if Donald Trump Wins?..."The conventional wisdom is that, right off the bat, the stock market would fall precipitously."
http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/tom-blumer/2016/11/10/ny-timess-paul-krugman-trump-wins-markets-will-never-recover - NY Times's Paul Krugman, As Trump Wins: Markets Will 'Never' Recover
http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/2016/09/06/Mark-Cuban-Stocks-Will-Crash-if-Trump-Wins - Mark Cuban: Stocks Will Crash if Trump Wins


luckily for good hard-working Americans who voted for and support Trump, our confidence was fully expressed once his election was confirmed and has ever since B)


huh, what a bunch of fools

every projection i've seen had the markets rising considerably immediately after the election, because it dropped due to the instability and uncertainty of the election
Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
May 17 2017 04:36pm
@excellence you perfectly know markets had a big issue today; most are involving trump and his credibility, including the credibility of his promises...

http://www.cnbc.com/2017/05/17/the-risk-to-stocks-is-rising-because-the-political-risk-story-is-changing.html

[x] stupidity
Member
Posts: 53,340
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
May 17 2017 04:39pm
Quote (Saucisson6000 @ 17 May 2017 18:36)
@excellence you perfectly know markets had a big issue today

do the markets stop forever today?
Member
Posts: 5,984
Joined: Jan 8 2010
Gold: 745.69
May 17 2017 04:51pm
Quote (Goomshill @ May 17 2017 12:10am)
so I get the facts on this one straight:

The FBI cleared Flynn of wrongdoing pertaining to russia on Jan 23rd, finding no incriminating evidence
Trump had dinner with Comey on Jan 27th, and then "Attempted to obstruct justice" retroactively or something
Comey sat on this for 4 months straight without saying a word about this attempt to obstruct justice
even though he is required by law to report attempts to obstruct justice or be himself guilty of misprision of a felony
and just now it comes out after he's fired

Did I get the timeline right?
I mean I guess there some question as to how good a case of misprision could be possible given the 'active' component of concealment


Why did the thread not end at this point, where it was clearly demonstrated that it's not logically possible for any of the alleged wrongdoing to have taken place?
Member
Posts: 53,340
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
May 17 2017 05:03pm
Quote (Magicman657 @ 17 May 2017 18:51)
Why did the thread not end at this point, where it was clearly demonstrated that it's not logically possible for any of the alleged wrongdoing to have taken place?

the resident democrats and leftie losers wanted to 'investigate the matter further' to see if President Trump can indeed time travel to obstruct justice in the past.
Member
Posts: 48,844
Joined: Jun 18 2006
Gold: 5,016.77
May 17 2017 05:04pm
Quote (Magicman657 @ May 17 2017 05:51pm)
Why did the thread not end at this point, where it was clearly demonstrated that it's not logically possible for any of the alleged wrongdoing to have taken place?


Cause it's easily debunked. Read further, or learn to think.
Member
Posts: 5,984
Joined: Jan 8 2010
Gold: 745.69
May 17 2017 05:25pm
Quote (IceMage @ May 17 2017 06:04pm)
Cause it's easily debunked. Read further, or learn to think.


The Washington Post reported exactly that. I saw a few other papers citing this article, but I didn't see anything that directly contradicts it. Am I missing something here? I see a lot about the memo, but haven't yet seen anything that claimed WaPo's report was factually incorrect.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/fbi-reviewed-flynns-calls-with-russian-ambassador-but-found-nothing-illicit/2017/01/23/aa83879a-e1ae-11e6-a547-5fb9411d332c_story.html?utm_term=.dfe33aab7588
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev18910111220Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll