d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > 9th Circuit Court Rules Unanimously
Prev18910111219Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 105,156
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,475.00
Feb 9 2017 07:44pm
Quote (Plaguefear @ Feb 9 2017 08:42pm)
See what i mean?
The boogeyman.
Do not worry, in a few years you will find another minority to be terrified of.




LMAO. I won't have to find one. WE will be the minority, and will be hiding our children from Islamic terrorists, that we invited in to our country.
Member
Posts: 50,951
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,335.99
Feb 9 2017 07:49pm
Quote (Plaguefear @ Feb 9 2017 07:41pm)
"Everyone knows" is a stretch.


let alone the constitutionality of a law that falls abundantly within the powers of the executive, is precedented and any equal protection clause challenge rests on playing connect the dots with hearsay and media spin- the lower court never showed the basic four pronged test for a TRO or injunction. Where do they pull 'irreparable harm' out of their ass when a temporary immigration ban with exceptions for emergencies can be reversed by simply letting people into the country? Its not an abortion, its not an execution or demolishing a national monument, its something that can easily be reversed. The washington lawyer in oral even tried bringing up "financial losses" from lost work time at the university, when the law clearly defines irreparable harm as explicitly excluding economic losses. As far as substantial likelihood of success, see the first sentence. They could argue public interest and balance of harms and win, but their ruling has a couple holes big enough to drive a dump truck through. Now granted the 9th circuit can dodge that by pretending they only need to comment on irreparable harm to revoke rather than uphole, and claim the government doesn't have it, but its entirely within their powers to simply point out the bogus case made by the lower court and throw it out. But they didn't, and its no secret why.

This post was edited by Goomshill on Feb 9 2017 07:55pm
Member
Posts: 12,201
Joined: Feb 13 2010
Gold: 14.88
Feb 9 2017 07:56pm
Quote (Plaguefear @ Feb 9 2017 05:37pm)
I reported it, because it is childish.
I know it must be hard to grow up in a first world country with all the opportunity in the world so i can understand your anger over trivial nonsense, but is it really that hard to be respectful to people you disagree with?


😢
Member
Posts: 12,201
Joined: Feb 13 2010
Gold: 14.88
Feb 9 2017 07:58pm
I'm just saying, America needs fascism.
Member
Posts: 70,459
Joined: Feb 3 2006
Gold: 28,299.69
Feb 9 2017 07:59pm
Quote (PlasmaSnake101 @ Feb 9 2017 06:58pm)
I'm just saying, America needs fascism.


have we calmed down? you don't get a snack until you calm down and apologize to the class for throwing the fit
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Feb 9 2017 08:00pm
Quote (Goomshill @ Feb 9 2017 07:49pm)
let alone the constitutionality of a law that falls abundantly within the powers of the executive, is precedented and any equal protection clause challenge rests on playing connect the dots with hearsay and media spin- the lower court never showed the basic four pronged test for a TRO or injunction. Where do they pull 'irreparable harm' out of their ass when a temporary immigration ban with exceptions for emergencies can be reversed by simply letting people into the country? Its not an abortion, its not an execution or demolishing a national monument, its something that can easily be reversed. The washington lawyer in oral even tried bringing up "financial losses" from lost work time at the university, when the law clearly defines irreparable harm as explicitly excluding economic losses. As far as substantial likelihood of success, see the first sentence. They could argue public interest and balance of harms and win, but their ruling has a couple holes big enough to drive a dump truck through. Now granted the 9th circuit can dodge that by pretending they only need to comment on irreparable harm to revoke rather than uphole, and claim the government doesn't have it, but its entirely within their powers to simply point out the bogus case made by the lower court and throw it out. But they didn't, and its no secret why.


Tldr
Member
Posts: 105,156
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,475.00
Feb 9 2017 08:02pm
When Hitler wanted to take over the world...everyone rallied and stopped him.


Now the Muslims, again, (don't forget the Crusades now) are trying this...When will you see it?

I'm no fan of most of China's politics, BUT, they are being truly smart. They have more or less shut their borders to everyone and to the internet as well.

/e I wonder how many muslims are in China? Lol

This post was edited by Ghot on Feb 9 2017 08:03pm
Member
Posts: 65,046
Joined: Jul 7 2008
Gold: Locked
Feb 9 2017 08:03pm
Quote (Ghot @ Feb 9 2017 07:02pm)
When Hitler wanted to take over the world...everyone rallied and stopped him.


Now the Muslims, again, (don't forget the Crusades now) are trying this...When will you see it?

I'm no fan of most of China's politics, BUT, they are being truly smart. They have more or less shut their borders to everyone and to the internet as well.


ISIS is not a credible threat to world domination.
Member
Posts: 12,201
Joined: Feb 13 2010
Gold: 14.88
Feb 9 2017 08:03pm
Quote (Beowulf @ Feb 9 2017 05:59pm)
have we calmed down? you don't get a snack until you calm down and apologize to the class for throwing the fit


Kid, I'd go defile your ancestors graves but I don't want to get pulled into my tv. You'll get nothing from me.
Member
Posts: 12,201
Joined: Feb 13 2010
Gold: 14.88
Feb 9 2017 08:04pm
Quote (BardOfXiix @ Feb 9 2017 06:03pm)
ISIS is not a credible threat to world domination.


Translation: Please let the muzzies in so they shoot up magazine offices, concerts, etc.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev18910111219Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll