I dunno i think ill go with thor. His account has a big number in it

Calling him a troll is giving him far too much credit. You've been around long enough to know better.

Omg, I was going to link timecube.com but it's gone! RIP

You're like a year late, lol.

Well damn. Why must things change?

Alright guys, this forum is retarded. I'm out for another month.

This isn't what most of FE theory is about, this is the really extrapolated assumptions about how his depiction of the model might work.

Most of the stuff you'd find IF you thought it be worth investigating is from creators and not aggregators. But even from creators the theory is devised by superficial observation with varied explanation, in a way that one could suppose the flatness of the system.

What he's asserting on the other hand is what zealots have predetermined based on their connections, that justify their God's infallibility, by evidence of those superficial observations.

The whole thing *kind of* works because NASA has definitely been shown to AT LEAST gloss up their show with visual effects. Which would mean the moon landing's proof of gravity should be questioned.

Once you look at gravity with a critical eye, one could suppose that all the phenomena that is used to describe gravity can be replicated with magnets.






The math *works* in both instances of magnetic universe and gravitational universe, except relativity as Tesla described it:
"...a beggar, wrapped in purple, whom ignorant people took for a king." In support of his statement he cited a number of experiments he had conducted, he said, as far back as 1896 on the cosmic ray.
I tried to show how 1+1 could equate to 3 and failed so obviously I'm not a strong voice for the mathematical nature of the universe and how something can be proven.




This and southern hemisphere stars creating circles in the same shape as the northern hemisphere stars. It most definitely would necessitate spherical geometry.
I've heard a few different explanations that *kind of* work but most of those take the perspective thing from being well understood to magical.
Other than those, I'd say after 2 months of fucking with this with an open mind there's actually a preponderance of evidence it is flat.

This post was edited by MaliceMizer on Jun 7 2016 03:46pm

Not our fault crack pot theories actually get discussed

provide said math for a magnetic universe and remember the difference in magnitude between gravitational force and electromagnetic force as mentioned here http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/forces/funfor.html

Liberals.
Convert to conservatism.