Quote (doomchaser @ Mar 27 2013 08:56am)
I hope i am wrong I don't see how you can change what i see they doing...
This is the problem right here. If you don't know how a belief could be falsified, even in principle, it is a tautology, and has no value.
Consider the following two situations:
1. Aircraft are secretly dispersing chemicals (other than H2O and CO2) into the air, which leaves a white streak behind the airplane.
2. Aircraft engines are releasing H2O into the air, which leaves a white streak behind the airplane.
How can you tell the difference between these 2 situations? This is the whole problem. We know aircraft will leave a white streak behind them based on #2, so you can't use that as evidence for the existence of #1 (since even if #1 is false, there will still be white streaks).
So we want evidence for #1, that does not involve things that would be produced by #2. A good way is you could document the enormous money trail that should exist to pays off the hundreds of thousands of meteorologists, chemists, pilots, FAA employees, aircraft mechanics, ground crews, laboratories, truck drivers, airliners, and others involved in manufacturing, delivery, instillation, the dispersal of these chemicals.
This post was edited by Azrad on Mar 27 2013 10:30am