We don't need carbon dating to work beyond 40-50k Dinosaurs were here long before that, and humans less than that. If the bones are so old carbon dating doesn't work then they didn't live with us.
Geological evidence is strong enough to substantiate that dinosaurs were long before us. We don't need to put an exact date on how many millions of years if we're only talking about if they lived with people or not.
Dragon pictures? I love that one. I LOL every time I see it on some YEC site. I have some drawings of bigfoot, too.

Not only does the existing evidence show dinosaurs lived long before us, there is no credible evidence to suggest they did live with us.

was that link supposed to in some way strengthen your arguement ?



call all the bullshit you want
show your own studys that the majority of christains in fact do beleive this




yeah , all those older strata with dinosaurs , and no humans
and all those newer strata , with humans , and no dinosaurs
zero evidence ........

This post was edited by Matao on May 24 2011 11:40am

as long as it's not taught as certainty, but as an opinion/belief it's not abuse.. if it's taught as certainty aka straight up lying, than that's wrong... obviously parents are teaching this to their kids as factual, which is fucked up.

...and there is zero evidence that they didn't

checkmate

Believing something is not knowing something.

A belief requires no evidence or reason, which is why that term is used with religion.

You can only come to that conclusion by willfully ignoring the evidence. Simply closing your eyes and ears doesn't make something go away.

Based on what? You keep saying "They were and they weren't" but you aren't providing any proof.
What geological evidence? Can you provide please?
Why do you think dragon pictures in ancient times aren't proof of dinosaurs living with man?
What existing evidence? You haven't shown us any. Also, you are saying the evidence that says likewise isn't credible? How do you know that?




We don't need to find proof to prove YOUR theories right.

what is a fact? how do you define truth?

I wonder how many people actually know what this discussion is about ?

( hint - it's not dinosaurs )

You fail to understand how carbon dating works. It no longer works accurately beyond 40-50k years, meaning the results are jaded. You cannot use carbon dating to prove or disprove dinosaur age being old or young.

Geological evidence is based purely on assumptions, no direct dating techniques work to identify the true age of rock formations. We have found trees that grow through multiple rock strata, how is that possible? Trees that are hundreds of millions of years old? Talk about fairy tales.

I have a picture of Abraham Lincoln. By your logic, that doesn't prove he ever existed, and by your very statement, you agree that you will not take photographic evidence into account as proof. This means that you yourself are limiting what you will accept as proof, and basing this entirely on belief. Even rudamentary studies on ancient cultures will show that Dragons are not simply "lul", unless you truly believe that man in all parts of the world came up with the same stories, magically, by chance, out of thin air. Heck, you're free to believe anything you want.