Quote (thesnipa @ Jul 20 2023 02:14pm)
So, man wanted for defrauding his own country alleges through an informant that he has 2 recordings of joe biden coercing him to bribe him.
really solid stuff, this time Joe is DONE FOR!
liberal media attacks on Trump really broke up what we consider a breaking story with solid evidence. i cant even imagine how fast you'd dismiss this story if it were about some wanted criminal alleging he has tapes of trump eliciting a bribe from him.
Well, its consistent with the proof we have, that payments happened despite a total lack of legal justification- millions to an unqualified crackhead- that everyone involved with no reason to lie was discussing the payments on their emails / texts, that these people met many times (and Joe Biden repeatedly lie about it), and that Joe Biden actually did intervene quite overtly. So we've got the quid, the quo and the pro. This just alleges that it occurred for a reason, a reason that was quite obvious. And on top of all that, it was sworn to by an FBI source directly involved in it, before it became a hot button national issue.
So I mean, what's the reason to doubt it? That everything else could be true about this story except that the audio recordings exist? Which mind you
could actually be bullshit that Zlochevsky was spouting just while puffing up himself, but it would be nonsensical in that case, and not make one iota a difference to the underlying bribery scandal. But even assuming the audio recordings exist, there's no reason he would self-incriminate and release them, so we can assume they either are suppressed or destroyed anyway.
At this point the wacko conspiracy theory would be that everyone involved manufactured great amounts of evidence and years of messages between each other just to falsely incriminate Joe/Hunter/James/Sara Biden, rather than the theory that they were in an actual conspiracy, because we've got a metric ton of evidence they actually were.