Quote (ChrisKz @ Oct 12 2016 07:36pm)
Not exactly. A lot of people hold the moral belief against abortion because of religious values and a lot of people don't agree that life isn't life if it is just conception and morally entail themselves to be antiabortion.
Also a lot of people think that, perhaps, there is some sort of middle ground so they agree in abortion for people who were raped and say that the rest cannot have an abortion. This is politics. If I could have my moral sanctuary *yes plz give me a safe space*
There would be no rape, there would be no abortion (because people would be responsible with preventatives),and there would be no crime!
But we have to live in a world where there are many contrasting opinions that out right oppose one another! A good way to climb over the wall and shake hands is to say, hey! Lets compromise!
But since you are too dumb to think of such a concept I'll just lay it out for you B)
Np, I care about you brother. I am 6 percent native american.
You just move goal posts when you try to debate.
Anti-abortion is rooted in the argument that the fetus is a human and that it's murder.
The entire debate is predicated on if the fetus can be considered a human being or worthy of protection by the state.
People who are against it except in cases of rape are just being inconsistent.
And you're bringing up safe spaces and start going on tangents about random stuff.
And I'm the one who can't think of concepts? You don't even respond with anything of substance that refutes what I claimed. You just go on about compromises when that is irrelevant. Of course being against abortion except in cases of rape is a compromise and that's the entire reason why it is inconsistent. If you place value on the fetus except on certain scenarios which in a way removes sanctity of life to your viewpoint.
This post was edited by sir_lance_bb on Oct 12 2016 06:47pm