Quote (Voyaging @ 12 Oct 2016 19:58)
Yes they just have different morals. The problem, though, is that the Republican's morals are not morals at all. They are fundamentally Ayn Randian selfish anti-morals. It is the opposite of morality.
I'm not sure what you are speaking of. Mostly people who handle their money correctly and plan well choose when to have children and don't need to have abortions or anything of the like. Through all the BLM and other scandelous issues we see on both sides of the current election we forgot the original divisions of liberals and republicans in this recent times.
Most of it had to do with how we apply healthy care, when abortion is or is not legal, marijuana legalization, whether or not gays can get married (Im pretty sure this is legal in most states now but i don't keep up on these things), and the rights of people on welfare and how long they are allowed to be on it.
Forget BLM, forget grab by the pussy, forget the deleted emails and the exploitation of taxes through legal means.....
Most of these issues are pointless, or pertaining to the crimes/ cringe reasons why people wouldn't elect a candidate.
Most conservatives believe in abortion only if the person has been raped. Liberals believe in right of choice, but there is different consideration on when is the 'bundle of cells' as they call it is considered a human being.
Recently you posters in this part of the forum have gotten a high of how smart you think you are because you have a certain set of morals that happen to agree with each other but forgotten how equal you are with the rest of the posters here (honestly there are few really intelligent people here. Most of you are quite average, including me)
I think its quite funny. I also think spelcheck is one of the stupidest people on both sides.