d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > The Mueller Report
Prev18889909192173Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 50,903
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,836.00
Apr 18 2019 11:46pm
spin cycles out from colbert;



gotta love towards the end @ 10 minutes
Barr: "We specifically asked Mueller whether he would have found a criminal charge, but for the OLC precedent that presidents can't be charged, and Mueller made it explicitly clear the answer is no"
Colbert: "The report cites the OLC opinion and recognizes that the precedent exists"
Colbert: "Therefore Barr stood on up stage and told a bald-faced LIE, he's a FUCKING LIAR"

so real talk. Does someone like Stephen Colbert actually understand just how illogical and misrepresentative his bullshit is, and gets up and says it anyway- or does he exist in some kind of phase between ignorance and delusion where he can't recognize it
Barr didn't say that Mueller didn't agree with the OLC rule, he said that Mueller agreed with the OLC rule but that even if the rule didn't exist, he still wouldn't charge Trump. And Colbert says that Mueller agreeing with the OLC rule contradicts Barr's statements
its inane, its stupid, its the absolute state of a media that cannot grapple with the implosion of their narrative
Member
Posts: 1,203
Joined: Jan 3 2018
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 10%
Apr 18 2019 11:48pm
Quote (Goomshill @ Apr 18 2019 11:46pm)
spin cycles out from colbert;

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7MursWMNONo

gotta love towards the end @ 10 minutes
Barr: "We specifically asked Mueller whether he would have found a criminal charge, but for the OLC precedent that presidents can't be charged, and Mueller made it explicitly clear the answer is no"
Colbert: "The report cites the OLC opinion and recognizes that the precedent exists"
Colbert: "Therefore Barr stood on up stage and told a bald-faced LIE, he's a FUCKING LIAR"

so real talk. Does someone like Stephen Colbert actually understand just how illogical and misrepresentative his bullshit is, and gets up and says it anyway- or does he exist in some kind of phase between ignorance and delusion where he can't recognize it
Barr didn't say that Mueller didn't agree with the OLC rule, he said that Mueller agreed with the OLC rule but that even if the rule didn't exist, he still wouldn't charge Trump. And Colbert says that Mueller agreeing with the OLC rule contradicts Barr's statements
its inane, its stupid, its the absolute state of a media that cannot grapple with the implosion of their narrative


Oh man. If you're surprised by Colbert you're going to lose it when you watch Tucker Carlson or Fox and Friends
Member
Posts: 50,903
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,836.00
Apr 18 2019 11:51pm
Quote (MizzouFTW @ Apr 18 2019 11:48pm)
Oh man. If you're surprised by Colbert you're going to lose it when you watch Tucker Carlson or Fox and Friends


I look to Colbert to give me an accurate representation of the status of liberal talking points and I can't stomach looking to Tucker so I go to T_D for the other side
Member
Posts: 1,203
Joined: Jan 3 2018
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 10%
Apr 18 2019 11:53pm
We live in the age of entertainment. That’s all it is. News died when channels stopped going off air the end of their broadcast.
Member
Posts: 38,137
Joined: May 28 2006
Gold: 0.00
Apr 19 2019 02:21am
collision confirmed

Member
Posts: 105,147
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,475.00
Apr 19 2019 04:24am
















Member
Posts: 49,894
Joined: Jun 19 2006
Gold: 3.88
Apr 19 2019 04:47am
Actually it does not say no collusion.
Member
Posts: 92,996
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Apr 19 2019 06:16am
Imagine going to the doctor for cancer screening and they walk into the office and say, "we did about 30 tests, sorry it took so long, but here is a 1 page summary of redacted information we found. we didn't find zero traces of cancer, but we didn't find a tumor. so you can rest easy, here's your copy."

This post was edited by thesnipa on Apr 19 2019 06:16am
Member
Posts: 105,147
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,475.00
Apr 19 2019 06:34am
Quote (thesnipa @ Apr 19 2019 08:16am)
Imagine going to the doctor for cancer screening and they walk into the office and say, "we did about 30 tests, sorry it took so long, but here is a 1 page summary of redacted information we found. we didn't find zero traces of cancer, but we didn't find a tumor. so you can rest easy, here's your copy."




That analogy might be appropriate if the Dems could give you cancer out of thin air. :)
Member
Posts: 28,884
Joined: Aug 11 2013
Gold: 10,712.00
Apr 19 2019 06:40am
Quote (Ghot @ Apr 19 2019 05:34am)
That analogy might be appropriate if the Dems could give you cancer out of thin air. :)



It would be more appropriate if this redaction was something unusual vs similar cases. If other similar cases didn’t get redacted yet this one does it would be a valid criticism, but as I understand it this is standard procedure.


Investigations happen all the time. Investigations go into archives with no one caring. Yet because so many people hate Trump, they latch onto any detail if they don’t get their way.

This post was edited by ofthevoid on Apr 19 2019 06:43am
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev18889909192173Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll