d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Election Was Rigged, Trap Was Set, Its Coming
Prev18888898908918921965Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 47,297
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
Warn: 10%
Feb 4 2021 11:52am
Quote (thesnipa @ Feb 4 2021 06:56am)
man of jesus, idolizes a gambler. LOL you're a real interesting guy man. post some more about the new world order so we can all laugh.


" idolizes a gambler"
(i would like to hear your argument for that assertion.)
Member
Posts: 21,486
Joined: Jul 21 2005
Gold: 438.40
Feb 4 2021 11:56am
Quote (TiStuff @ 4 Feb 2021 09:46)
hey everyone, its black history month

HAPPY BHM! Bidenis Pervertis says that only 300 Americans will get the vaccine. Wtf?!🤣🤣🤣
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ums_KOukLvY


Not willing to sit through a 20 minute video from some random feller. Not even saying he's not credible. Merely you've posted a 20 minute video like I should watch it. Why?

Can you at the very least provide a synopsis? The idea, when you're debating an issue, is that you know enough to DEBATE the issue. The name of the forum is Political & Religious DEBATE. Do you understand? To debate a topic, you need to know enough of the facts to understand both sides, to be able to counter all arguments that come against you.

You don't seem to know anything. Legitimately, you seem like an ignorant troll. Your solution is to throw out whatever fallacy suits your fancy, post a bitchute or youtube video, and walk away. You are less than informed, unintelligible, and quite frankly, a disgrace to the intellectual discord of this subforum.

Do better, or shut the fuck up.
Member
Posts: 93,011
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,214.94
Feb 4 2021 11:57am
Quote (TiStuff @ Feb 4 2021 11:52am)
" idolizes a gambler"
(i would like to hear your argument for that assertion.)


u mean other than naming his jsp account after a poker player, having that poker players picture in his profile, and being a poker player? lol
Member
Posts: 47,297
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
Warn: 10%
Feb 4 2021 11:58am
Quote (Thor123422 @ Feb 4 2021 07:47am)
Then he's an idiot. It might have been unlikely *based on previous election results* but that doesn't mean it's impossible, or even improbable, since an election every 4 years is a really small sample size and we were in a particularly unique election season.

This is something people with a poor understanding of statics don't understand. Statics are worthless without considering real world circumstances. If I take a random sampling of my car's speed for 1 minute and determine that it has increased 100% of the time you would, based purely on statistics, conclude that breaks are an impossibility. This is basically what the "the results are impossible cuz statics" crowd are doing. They're ignoring real world circumstances and concluding that the election results looking different therefore fraud.


the only "smat" people in the world watch fake news, have huge TDS and been infatuated with russia russia russia collusion trump for four years. These are the only clear thinking people who demand election fraud just cant possibly be.
Member
Posts: 47,297
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
Warn: 10%
Feb 4 2021 12:02pm
Quote (InsaneBobb @ Feb 4 2021 09:56am)
Not willing to sit through a 20 minute video from some random feller. Not even saying he's not credible. Merely you've posted a 20 minute video like I should watch it. Why?

Can you at the very least provide a synopsis? The idea, when you're debating an issue, is that you know enough to DEBATE the issue. The name of the forum is Political & Religious DEBATE. Do you understand? To debate a topic, you need to know enough of the facts to understand both sides, to be able to counter all arguments that come against you.

You don't seem to know anything. Legitimately, you seem like an ignorant troll. Your solution is to throw out whatever fallacy suits your fancy, post a bitchute or youtube video, and walk away. You are less than informed, unintelligible, and quite frankly, a disgrace to the intellectual discord of this subforum.

Do better, or shut the fuck up.


i think Jericho Green 277K subscriber is pretty cool. he swears too much for my tastes but is still cool.
And listen dip stick my post are not solely for your person, so stop acting like some stuck up school girl.
Member
Posts: 47,297
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
Warn: 10%
Feb 4 2021 12:05pm
Quote (thesnipa @ Feb 4 2021 09:57am)
u mean other than naming his jsp account after a poker player, having that poker players picture in his profile, and being a poker player? lol


i dont know who thats a pic of. I suppose you cant deal with his content so you take shots at a pic?
Member
Posts: 93,011
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,214.94
Feb 4 2021 12:05pm
Quote (TiStuff @ Feb 4 2021 12:05pm)
i dont know who thats a pic of. I suppose you cant deal with his content so you take shots at a pic?


Tom Durrrrrr Dwan
Member
Posts: 21,486
Joined: Jul 21 2005
Gold: 438.40
Feb 4 2021 12:38pm
Quote (TiStuff @ 4 Feb 2021 10:02)
i think Jericho Green 277K subscriber is pretty cool. he swears too much for my tastes but is still cool.
And listen dip stick my post are not solely for your person, so stop acting like some stuck up school girl.


I do not deny that the person I'm not familiar with is pretty cool. He probably is. Hell, he may even be 100% accurate in what he says, and I may even find dog just by listening.

None of that matters. If you wish me to watch a 20 minute video, it's on YOU to provide a synopsis. Give me the chance to either get your narrative, or watch the source. And then, when you either misrepresent, or present something so incredibly biased that it's disgusting, you lose all credibility.

Instead, you say nothing, and simply expect me to lose hours and hours and hours to try to keep up with all your spam from videos alone.

Hint: I'm listening to a video, with news on TV, while posting, often on discord, and am playing games between posts. I do NOT have the number of fingers I need to satisfy your craving to "know your sources". First, why don't you DESCRIBE your sources, so I can determine for myself if you're credible enough to even bother with your sources?
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Feb 4 2021 12:41pm
Quote (InsaneBobb @ Feb 4 2021 12:38pm)
I do not deny that the person I'm not familiar with is pretty cool. He probably is. Hell, he may even be 100% accurate in what he says, and I may even find dog just by listening.

None of that matters. If you wish me to watch a 20 minute video, it's on YOU to provide a synopsis. Give me the chance to either get your narrative, or watch the source. And then, when you either misrepresent, or present something so incredibly biased that it's disgusting, you lose all credibility.

Instead, you say nothing, and simply expect me to lose hours and hours and hours to try to keep up with all your spam from videos alone.

Hint: I'm listening to a video, with news on TV, while posting, often on discord, and am playing games between posts. I do NOT have the number of fingers I need to satisfy your craving to "know your sources". First, why don't you DESCRIBE your sources, so I can determine for myself if you're credible enough to even bother with your sources?


I've tried to get him to at least post summaries multiple times. He adamently refuse
Member
Posts: 47,297
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
Warn: 10%
Feb 4 2021 12:45pm
Quote (InsaneBobb @ Feb 4 2021 10:38am)
I do not deny that the person I'm not familiar with is pretty cool. He probably is. Hell, he may even be 100% accurate in what he says, and I may even find dog just by listening.

None of that matters. If you wish me to watch a 20 minute video, it's on YOU to provide a synopsis. Give me the chance to either get your narrative, or watch the source. And then, when you either misrepresent, or present something so incredibly biased that it's disgusting, you lose all credibility.

Instead, you say nothing, and simply expect me to lose hours and hours and hours to try to keep up with all your spam from videos alone.

Hint: I'm listening to a video, with news on TV, while posting, often on discord, and am playing games between posts. I do NOT have the number of fingers I need to satisfy your craving to "know your sources". First, why don't you DESCRIBE your sources, so I can determine for myself if you're credible enough to even bother with your sources?


listen dude. I dont care about your ranting or your subjective reasoning you dont have to watch it and you dont even have to read my posts.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev18888898908918921965Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll