d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Trumpers Tearing Down Dc.
Prev18788899091346Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 21,486
Joined: Jul 21 2005
Gold: 438.40
Jan 7 2021 10:43am
Quote (thesnipa @ 7 Jan 2021 08:29)
ahh what i expected. more legal bullshit way above your paygrade and goalpost shifting.

its funny how u go from "the law is the law" to "the law shouldnt be the law because its not constitutional if it ever goes before the SCOTUS and that is the law even if the law is the law"

there are hundreds, perhaps thousands, of laws nationwide protecting govt areas in a restricted sense to the general public. so many potentials for a scotus case and the case law is so old that its nearly as set as the constitution.

you're literally just fooled by the word "public". its cute, but u sound like a toddler to even the most basic of legally educated people.

i had you pegged a few posts back, no need to carry on with a dreamer. u use legal language to describe the world how u wish it was, not how it is. its an appeal to authority (the law) which you're not mentally able to even appeal to because u dont understand it. you live in a dream world where the constitution is the only law of the land, and that's false. constitutionality is offset by precedent AND public safety concerns, as well as personal freedoms being less protected than federal proceedings. you can wish this wasnt the case, that's fine, a bit silly, childish and selfish, but factually ok. its when u pretend this isnt the case with nothing but an honorary degree from Judge Judy that you pass into delusion. and you sir are as deluded as they come but with a powdered sugar topping.


Digging the nonsense. Keep going. Before you start though, explain why the 2018 occupiers were released without charge.

There's nothing dreamy here. Public servants establishing special rules for themselves is nothing new. Having it not amount to anything is also nothing new. You want to make a case for why people occupying a public building is worse than people burning down privately owned buildings? Make the case. Otherwise, pretty much everything you're saying boils down to, "unconstitutional or not, public servants are way more special and get special treatment!111!!ONE!!" Okay. Meantime, the reality is that those who occupied peacefully will at most get a misdemeanor and fined. Those who carried weapons onto the premises will have the book thrown at them, as they would literally any other time. We done, or you ready to grandstand some more?
Member
Posts: 92,970
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Jan 7 2021 10:45am
Per the US constitution:

Quote
The Congress shall have Power To… exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States… (The U.S. Constitution, Article I, Section 8, Clause 17)


this issue of federal jurisdiction over restricted areas for government proceedings is essentially as old as the constitution, and far older than almost all of the ammendments (perhaps all, im not gonna get out a timeline).


Quote
In The Federalist No. 43, James Madison explained the need for a "federal district," subject to Congress's exclusive jurisdiction and separate from the territory, and authority, of any single state:
/QUOTE]

Quote
The indispensable necessity of compleat authority at the seat of Government carries its own evidence with it. It is a power exercised by every Legislature of the Union, I might say of the world, by virtue of its general supremacy. Without it, not only the public authority might be insulted and its proceedings be interrupted, with impunity; but a dependence of the members of the general Government, on the State comprehending the seat of the Government for protection in the exercise of their duty, might bring on the national councils an imputation of awe or influence, equally dishonorable to the Government, and dissatisfactory to the other members of the confederacy.[


Quote
Madison's concerns about insults to the "public authority" were not speculative. In June 1783, several hundred unpaid and angry Continental soldiers had marched on Philadelphia, menacing Congress in Independence Hall itself. Pennsylvania refused all requests for assistance and, after two days, Congress adjourned. Its Members fled into New Jersey.

The incident made a lasting impression. The Framers referenced it over and again in defending their provision for a "federal town," which Anti-Federalists persisted in visualizing as a sink of corruption and a potential nursery for tyrants. In fact, however, the need for a territory in which the general government exercised full sovereignty, not beholden to any state, was probably inherent in the federal system itself.

At the time, the location of the new capital was more contentious than its necessity. Both New York and Pennsylvania were desperate for the plum-with Benjamin Franklin urging Pennsylvania's Legislature to grant the land moments after the proposed Constitution was first read to that body. In any event, a "Southern" site was selected, near the fall line of the Potomac River. In exchange, the Southern states agreed that the new federal government would assume the states' Revolutionary War debts, which were more burdensome to the Northern states. That arrangement was sealed in a meeting between Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson in which the South gained the capital, but the federal government obtained economic prowess. Maryland and Virginia ceded "ten miles square" on their respective sides of the river, and the government finally moved to its permanent seat in 1800.




this literally happened Pre-DC, and the framing of DC was created specifically to protect Government functions and to not depend on any state for protection in doing so.

Quote (InsaneBobb @ Jan 7 2021 10:43am)
Digging the nonsense. Keep going. Before you start though, explain why the 2018 occupiers were released without charge.

There's nothing dreamy here. Public servants establishing special rules for themselves is nothing new. Having it not amount to anything is also nothing new. You want to make a case for why people occupying a public building is worse than people burning down privately owned buildings? Make the case. Otherwise, pretty much everything you're saying boils down to, "unconstitutional or not, public servants are way more special and get special treatment!111!!ONE!!" Okay. Meantime, the reality is that those who occupied peacefully will at most get a misdemeanor and fined. Those who carried weapons onto the premises will have the book thrown at them, as they would literally any other time. We done, or you ready to grandstand some more?


i want them arrested, too. idiot.

This post was edited by thesnipa on Jan 7 2021 10:46am
Member
Posts: 47,202
Joined: Jun 6 2015
Gold: 41,337.67
Jan 7 2021 10:45am
Quote (proccy @ Jan 7 2021 07:41am)
we've touched on this, in this thread.

apparently they "Didn't have time to barricade the doors"

did they get the order to stand down ala 9/11? I'm sure the conspiracy theorists are already on it



it absolutely should SHOCK everyone not that these larpers got in (numbers help-sorry BLMantifas) - but rather than this should have been one of the most secure places on the planet that day



A virus and a group of rednecks crippled the “most powerful country in the world” its hilarious how shitty America is prepared to handle most situations that aren’t war

This post was edited by BasedGoff on Jan 7 2021 10:46am
Member
Posts: 38,671
Joined: Apr 1 2007
Gold: 8.21
Jan 7 2021 10:45am
Quote (nomadwgk @ Jan 7 2021 08:43am)
I mean cops were taking selfies with them.


i saw a few cases of that - and it looked to me to be smart police action to be perfectly honest

when there was like 4 cops stationed at a door and 1000 people show up. They tried to be friendly with them - and it worked (albeit temporarily). After they established a rapport with the larpers,the larpers were more likely to listen to commands

having said that, commanding the first 10 people in line to stop pushing doesn't stop the other 900 behind them from pushing pushing pushing

it's a miracle nobody was trampled
Member
Posts: 38,671
Joined: Apr 1 2007
Gold: 8.21
Jan 7 2021 10:47am
Quote (BasedGoff @ Jan 7 2021 08:45am)
A virus and a group of rednecks crippled the “most powerful country in the world” its hilarious how shitty America is prepared to handle most situations that aren’t war


american rednecks are the strongest rednecks in the world though

Member
Posts: 19,203
Joined: Nov 12 2005
Gold: 30.70
Jan 7 2021 10:47am
Peaceful protest until BLM and Antifa gets involved.

I really hope for the day media goes away. You people just don't pay attention.

This post was edited by D_urRRR on Jan 7 2021 10:47am
Member
Posts: 11,669
Joined: Jun 10 2006
Gold: 985.05
Jan 7 2021 10:49am
Quote (proccy @ Jan 7 2021 10:45am)
i saw a few cases of that - and it looked to me to be smart police action to be perfectly honest

when there was like 4 cops stationed at a door and 1000 people show up. They tried to be friendly with them - and it worked (albeit temporarily). After they established a rapport with the larpers,the larpers were more likely to listen to commands

having said that, commanding the first 10 people in line to stop pushing doesn't stop the other 900 behind them from pushing pushing pushing

it's a miracle nobody was trampled


I agree, all things consider things were really peaceful for a such a huge gathering and like you said they were mostly Larping some sort of revolutionary dream of yesterday.
Member
Posts: 16,297
Joined: Oct 1 2010
Gold: 22,398.45
Jan 7 2021 10:50am
Quote (D_urRRR @ Jan 7 2021 09:47am)
Peaceful protest until BLM and Antifa gets involved.

I really hope for the day media goes away. You people just don't pay attention.



Let me understand this....

The mob of Trumpists taking over Capitol Hill was caused by BLM and Antifa?
Member
Posts: 21,486
Joined: Jul 21 2005
Gold: 438.40
Jan 7 2021 10:51am
Quote (thesnipa @ 7 Jan 2021 08:45)
i want them arrested, too. idiot.


You want who arrested? Is the capitol building still occupied?

There's a plethora of video evidence of who did what. Anyone who caused any damage or carried weapons should indeed be arrested and charged for their crimes. Those who peacefully occupied? Why arrest them? So that you just release them without charge? Again, the purpose of the arrests in 2018 was to remove them from the premises, not to charge them.

I'm still just stunned that the same people who're claiming that having the area cleared during violent BLM riots was some dictator move on Trump's part, but are now demanding police action. Pick a side, folks.
Member
Posts: 38,671
Joined: Apr 1 2007
Gold: 8.21
Jan 7 2021 10:52am
Quote (nomadwgk @ Jan 7 2021 08:49am)
I agree, all things consider things were really peaceful for a such a huge gathering and like you said they were mostly Larping some sort of revolutionary dream of yesterday.


I was fully pro Antifa-BLM years ago before they started wrecking everything in their path during demonstrations

if these larpers were burning all the flags they saw in the building (something blm would absolutely do)
if they spraypainted scrawled messages on every surface they saw (something blm would absolutely do)

then I would absolutely call what happened yesterday a Riot


but again for the 5x time. I'm in a canadian hockey city. calling that a riot is a joke :lol:
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev18788899091346Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll