Quote (JadeSky @ Jul 4 2014 01:04pm)
OK, I misunderstood your post...
The subtext to her argument is '...not a child fed [with tax money], not a child educated [with tax money], not a child housed [with tax money].'
Her point being that the same people who oppose abortion are inclined to oppose child welfare, as well.
I'm more of a social libertarian than an economic one, and I'm quite comfortable agreeing to disagree that the government ought to intervene with issues like child hunger.
The hypocrisy lies in how some people would like to see a child birthed but uncared for. The economics of poverty and social liability of irresponsible parents are my main reasons for being pro-choice.
And like I said, opposing massive taxes is not the same as opposing child education/housing/food.
The subtext is she is a lying douchebag pretending her ideological opponents think children shouldn't be taken care of and you pridefully re-posted it.
Who are these magical people that think children should starve? You can't find them.
This post was edited by cambovenzi on Jul 4 2014 11:26am