Quote (Thor123422 @ 22 Dec 2020 11:23)
You are getting caught up on "knowing". Nobody ever "knows" anything about what will happen when something is injected. If I were taking your approach, I would say that nobody "knows" that flu vaccinations this year will have the same rate of side effects as the vaccinations next year, and nobody "knows" that just because vaccines in the past didn't cause autism that the ones in the future won't and on and on and on.
Here's what we can say:
We have reason to be highly confident that there are no long-term side effects from this vaccination that are worse than long-term side effects from Covid, and we have reason to be highly confident that even if there are significant long term side effects they will be lower than the rate of long term effects compared to Covid, and we know this because we've studied the long term use of vaccines, and we've studied the long term effects of mRNA treatments, and we've studied the short term effects of using mRNA as a Covid vaccine, and we know the long term effects of Covid infection already.
What reason is there to be confident about any conclusions regarding long term side effects of an entirely new never before marketed form of vaccination that has not had long term testing?
The scientific method is based on observation, friend. There's hasn't been time to observe.

Hell, even the statement about long term effects of covid is mostly meaningless. In an asymptomatic person? It seems none, by your standards. In a 98 year old with heart disease? Probably death, given that'll be the short term result. Seems to me the 98 year old should get vaccinated, the person who got it, got over it, and never displayed a symptom'll be fine.
This post was edited by InsaneBobb on Dec 22 2020 01:38pm