d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate >
Poll > Trump 2020 > Trump Vs. Pack O' Dems
Prev1862863864865866983Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 49,289
Joined: Jun 18 2006
Gold: 11.77
Jan 31 2021 05:12pm
Quote (bogie160 @ Jan 31 2021 05:46pm)
Republicans value loyalty. It's what makes them such a powerful counter-party to the Democrats, whose base is undoubtedly larger.

Siding with the Democratic party to impeach the President in a ceremonial vote with zero real world application is a dramatic step. Cheney should have expected this.


So we're in agreement that it has nothing to do with policy, just tribalism and personality cult dynamics to the end.

Cheney understood the situation, yet she voted for accountability anyway. It's not hard to understand why.

It's not like I'm a fan of Liz Cheney, or her father, or George W Bush. I'm just able to acknowledge reality.

This post was edited by IceMage on Jan 31 2021 05:13pm
Member
Posts: 54,148
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Jan 31 2021 05:13pm
Quote (IceMage @ 31 Jan 2021 23:45)
When the only standard for separating the "swampy creatures" from the "Trump heroes" is whether they align in defending Trump's malfeasance

Bullshit. I've been plenty critical of people like Ted Cruz or Lindsey Graham who publicly sucked up to Trump, yet clearly are opportunistic, spineless swamp demons. Likewise, I've blasted Perdue and Loeffler for being horrible candidates who ran a weakass campaign in spite of their alignment with Trump. At least for me personally, the dividing line is not ostensible loyalty to Trump. The primary reason I dislike Liz Cheney are her shitty neocon foreign policy views, not her late distancing from Trump. We're obviously not discussing individual House members too much here on PaRD, so... believe me or not, idc.


Quote
Cheney wasn't losing any election before she decided to hold Trump accountable. McCarthy and Scalise are not mini-Pat Buchanans... yet they survive. Why is that?

Partially wrong. In 2014, she carpetbegged to Wyoming and challenged incumbent Mike Enzi in the GOP primary for the Senate, but got so little traction that she had to withdraw from the race.

McCarthy and Scalise are inoffensive on both a policy and a pro-/contra-Trump scale. Irrespective from her stance on Trump, Cheney has always been out of step with the base on foreign policy. It didnt matter until now because she's coming from a tiny R+40 state where there are no other powerhouse politicians competing for the House seat, so that her connections and name recognition allowed her to prevail against SomeDudes in the primaries. But like I said, the one time she tried to challenge an actual incumbent in Wyoming, she had to withdraw to avoid an embarrassment.



Quote
And I'll just circle back to the reality that you don't care about facts, evidence, or a political party going completely nuts. I don't know what to say to men who don't have a code.

I do have a code, it's just that I'm drawing the line far later than you do. The insurrection Trump incited crossed this line, and as a consequence, I dont want him to run for, let alone hold, public office ever again. I nonetheless disagree with the idea of post-presidency impeachment, and think that Democrats are predominantly pushing for this process so they can drive a wedge between the wings of the GOP and exacerbate their infighting.

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Jan 31 2021 05:15pm
Member
Posts: 33,925
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
Jan 31 2021 05:25pm
Quote (IceMage @ Jan 31 2021 06:12pm)
So we're in agreement that it has nothing to do with policy, just tribalism and personality cult dynamics to the end.

Cheney understood the situation, yet she voted for accountability anyway. It's not hard to understand why.

It's not like I'm a fan of Liz Cheney, or her father, or George W Bush. I'm just able to acknowledge reality.


Swamp creature defended her own interests.

Humans without honor defending themselves, nothing else to see here.
Member
Posts: 35,291
Joined: Aug 17 2004
Gold: 12,730.67
Jan 31 2021 05:44pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Jan 31 2021 12:03pm)
In my view, right-wing politics are about a preservation or restoration of a certain status quo, about protecting and fostering our wealth, safety and way of life. Because of the left's long march through the institutions and its resulting dominance over all cultural institutions (media, press, culture, academia), it has been the left which has enjoyed the strategic initiative for at least the past 25 years and been "on the offense" almost uninterrupted. This has created the false perception that conservatism is only about obstruction, or that it has become outright reactionary just because it seeks to roll back the worst excesses of the left.


The fever pitch reached a boiling point on January 6, and it will take time for it to go down. In the long run, however, Trump has lost all of his platforms. He is banned on social media, he no longer holds public office, and all efforts at establishing a new platform, be it a relaunched parler or TrumpTV, have failed so far. He has left office in disgrace, a majority in both the House and the Senate will vote against him, and he will only barely escape impeachment because of the 2/3rds hurdle. Moderate or untrumpy conservatives want nothing to do with him anymore. The party establishment around McConnell, as well as the donor class, will try everything they can to stop him dead in his tracks should he seek the nomination again in 2024. He will be embroiled in all sorts of legal battles and financial troubles. And last but not least, he's too old, his energy and sharpness have clearly been slipping.

He will just fade away more and more, but this process will take some time. He was the center of the political universe for 5 years, millions of voters projected all their hopes and dreams onto him. It is unrealistic to expect all of that to go away immediately. Yes, he will still have sway over a certain segment of the GOP electorate and be a power player during the primaries, but his own political career is over.


Indeed. The mechanism to do that is through obstruction though which is a GOOD thing. If we implemented every wacky idea that the Left had, we'd be in much worse shape. ALL conservative parties worldwide use obstruction as the main tool for how they operate. In America, that tool is on steroids due to hyperpolarization and our voting system.

I'm not convinced that Trump (and Trumpism) is going away. There were opportunities to discard him and they simply haven't done it yet. How many moderate or untrumpy conservatives are left in the GOP? Most have been purged or are so afraid of their voters that they can't take a stand publicly. Trump might not be President again but he can still dictate the direction of the party which is pretty damn powerful if you ask me. I don't think you could classify that as "his political career is over."
Member
Posts: 53,368
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Jan 31 2021 09:38pm
Quote (EndlessSky @ 1 Feb 2021 06:25)
Swamp creature defended her own interests.

Humans without honor defending themselves, nothing else to see here.

defending such swamp demons is par for the course for that user
Member
Posts: 35,291
Joined: Aug 17 2004
Gold: 12,730.67
Jan 31 2021 11:03pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Jan 31 2021 03:13pm)
Bullshit. I've been plenty critical of people like Ted Cruz or Lindsey Graham who publicly sucked up to Trump, yet clearly are opportunistic, spineless swamp demons. Likewise, I've blasted Perdue and Loeffler for being horrible candidates who ran a weakass campaign in spite of their alignment with Trump. At least for me personally, the dividing line is not ostensible loyalty to Trump. The primary reason I dislike Liz Cheney are her shitty neocon foreign policy views, not her late distancing from Trump. We're obviously not discussing individual House members too much here on PaRD, so... believe me or not, idc.



Partially wrong. In 2014, she carpetbegged to Wyoming and challenged incumbent Mike Enzi in the GOP primary for the Senate, but got so little traction that she had to withdraw from the race.

McCarthy and Scalise are inoffensive on both a policy and a pro-/contra-Trump scale. Irrespective from her stance on Trump, Cheney has always been out of step with the base on foreign policy. It didnt matter until now because she's coming from a tiny R+40 state where there are no other powerhouse politicians competing for the House seat, so that her connections and name recognition allowed her to prevail against SomeDudes in the primaries. But like I said, the one time she tried to challenge an actual incumbent in Wyoming, she had to withdraw to avoid an embarrassment.




I do have a code, it's just that I'm drawing the line far later than you do. The insurrection Trump incited crossed this line, and as a consequence, I dont want him to run for, let alone hold, public office ever again. I nonetheless disagree with the idea of post-presidency impeachment, and think that Democrats are predominantly pushing for this process so they can drive a wedge between the wings of the GOP and exacerbate their infighting.


And you're the only one! Perhaps you should listen Mark Levin and Michael Savage for a couple weeks to get a feel for what actually drives conservatives. They are the most popular radio hosts after Rush Limbaugh and have very loyal followings.

Unfortunately for you, a lot of Republicans don't feel the same way you do. They view the Trump as one of the greatest Presidents in the history of this country. He's allowed 4 more years so why wouldn't he take it? The nomination is his if he wants it.
Member
Posts: 54,148
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Jan 31 2021 11:08pm
Quote (thundercock @ 1 Feb 2021 00:44)
Indeed. The mechanism to do that is through obstruction though which is a GOOD thing. If we implemented every wacky idea that the Left had, we'd be in much worse shape. ALL conservative parties worldwide use obstruction as the main tool for how they operate. In America, that tool is on steroids due to hyperpolarization and our voting system.

The problem is that the left has crossed the Rubicon in some ways and was able to implement shitty policies and to establish shitty ideologies. Further obstruction of their ideas is desperately needed, but no longer sufficient on its own. We've arrived at a point where we need to roll back time by about 10 or so years, politically speaking, to get back on a good track. Given that conservatism has been on the defense almost uninterrupted for the past quarter century, I really struggle to see where this amount of offense is supposed to be coming from.

Quote
I'm not convinced that Trump (and Trumpism) is going away. There were opportunities to discard him and they simply haven't done it yet. How many moderate or untrumpy conservatives are left in the GOP? Most have been purged or are so afraid of their voters that they can't take a stand publicly. Trump might not be President again but he can still dictate the direction of the party which is pretty damn powerful if you ask me. I don't think you could classify that as "his political career is over."

Fair point, he could become some sort of spiritus rector of the GOP. But why would he want to do that? He's a fundamentally selfish and self-absorbed person, he cant be bothered to spend time and energy on a cause which doesnt directly and tangibly benefit himself. What would benefit himself and feed into his narcissism would be running again - but for the many reasons I listed repeatedly, I really dont think that this would go anywhere.

The Grover Cleveland path might have been viable after the November election, but not anymore, not after he fucked up the pivotal Georgia runoffs for his party and incited an insurrection. At this point, anyone but the hardcore trumpists in the GOP know that he would be an absolutely toxic candidate in the 2024 general election. Even many mild pro-Trump people will know deep down that that's the way it is.

The only way I can see these factors changing in a substantial way is if Trump indeed launches TrumpTV and it becomes a big success. In that case, he might be able to hold on to a large enough platform for 3 years that he can win the primary even against unified opposition by the RNC.
Member
Posts: 35,291
Joined: Aug 17 2004
Gold: 12,730.67
Jan 31 2021 11:19pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Jan 31 2021 09:08pm)
The problem is that the left has crossed the Rubicon in some ways and was able to implement shitty policies and to establish shitty ideologies. Further obstruction of their ideas is desperately needed, but no longer sufficient on its own. We've arrived at a point where we need to roll back time by about 10 or so years, politically speaking, to get back on a good track. Given that conservatism has been on the defense almost uninterrupted for the past quarter century, I really struggle to see where this amount of offense is supposed to be coming from.


Fair point, he could become some sort of spiritus rector of the GOP. But why would he want to do that? He's a fundamentally selfish and self-absorbed person, he cant be bothered to spend time and energy on a cause which doesnt directly and tangibly benefit himself. What would benefit himself and feed into his narcissism would be running again - but for the many reasons I listed repeatedly, I really dont think that this would go anywhere.

The Grover Cleveland path might have been viable after the November election, but not anymore, not after he fucked up the pivotal Georgia runoffs for his party and incited an insurrection. At this point, anyone but the hardcore trumpists in the GOP know that he would be an absolutely toxic candidate in the 2024 general election. Even many mild pro-Trump people will know deep down that that's the way it is.

The only way I can see these factors changing in a substantial way is if Trump indeed launches TrumpTV and it becomes a big success. In that case, he might be able to hold on to a large enough platform for 3 years that he can win the primary even against unified opposition by the RNC.


Can you be specific to the policies you're referring to? It seems to me that conservatives were quite happy until the financial crisis....I think the only big loss conservatives had was gay marriage. Politically speaking, conservatives have an outsized voice in American politics due to redistricting and the Senate.

Rallies where he is helping other candidates and funneling money to his businesses seems like it benefits him quite a lot. Why does Trump need TrumpTV when Foxnews, OANN, etc. are keeping the base angry? All Trump needs to do is have a plurality of the vote like he did last time.
Member
Posts: 54,148
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Jan 31 2021 11:34pm
Quote (thundercock @ 1 Feb 2021 06:19)
Can you be specific to the policies you're referring to? It seems to me that conservatives were quite happy until the financial crisis....I think the only big loss conservatives had was gay marriage. Politically speaking, conservatives have an outsized voice in American politics due to redistricting and the Senate.

Rallies where he is helping other candidates and funneling money to his businesses seems like it benefits him quite a lot. Why does Trump need TrumpTV when Foxnews, OANN, etc. are keeping the base angry? All Trump needs to do is have a plurality of the vote like he did last time.


Trump had a very weak plurality of around 35% and only won the primary because he was running against an extremely splintered field, so that his base of ~35% allowed him to secure enough delegates and momentum that he could no longer be stopped by the time the party leadership realized "oh shit, this guy might really win the nomination". The party elites wont allow the same events to unfold a second time if it comes to that.

Regarding the platform issue: I, personally, just think that Trump's relevance will quickly fade over time without public office or his twitter account. My prediction is that even by the end of this year, the world will talk very little about Donald Trump.


Too tired and lazy to go into great lengths on the policies on which I think liberalism has gone too far. Detailing all of that would require a proper essay. That's a discussion PaRD can have at some point in the future, when the day-to-day politics have become boring again.

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Jan 31 2021 11:35pm
Member
Posts: 34,649
Joined: Jul 2 2007
Gold: 273.37
Jan 31 2021 11:37pm
Quote (IceMage @ Jan 31 2021 06:12pm)
So we're in agreement that it has nothing to do with policy, just tribalism and personality cult dynamics to the end.

Cheney understood the situation, yet she voted for accountability anyway. It's not hard to understand why.

It's not like I'm a fan of Liz Cheney, or her father, or George W Bush. I'm just able to acknowledge reality.


It is a messy political arena, not a sterilized debate about politics. Impeaching Trump plays into incorrect narratives. Process was non-existent. It is another stepping stone on the road from Clinton's impeachment trial. Cheney jumped at it for the same reason Hawley jumped at the inverse. She thought it would play out better than it did, as I'm sure Hawley did.

This post was edited by bogie160 on Jan 31 2021 11:37pm
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1862863864865866983Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll