I prefer dealing in facts.

no you prefer dealing in semantics and sophism

Where is my "sophism"?

"Semantics"
Someone made a ridiculous exaggerated claim to mock what I posted. Correcting the record is valid.

considering how american presidents are aging during a mandate, the question is: what will happen to trump haircut !?

Thanks for tackling the big issues. You have a job waiting for you at CNN.

nah man, everything is objective and quantifiable!

This post was edited by wewlad on Dec 3 2016 05:25am

Your inability to draw a distinction between malnutrition and starvation is your shortcoming, not his. The dictionary is obviously the logical source to try getting you to pull your head out of your ass. One in eight people in the third world may indeed be suffering from malnutrition (one in five in Africa), but that does not mean 1/8 or 1/5 are suffering from starvation.

but surely you could expect an intelligent and inquisitive person to gauge that in a modern society, starvations is more or less equal to critical malnutrion. sorry, i might have spent too much time around people to connect with you two