Quote (thundercock @ 17 May 2022 05:08)
Increasing taxes to a sustainable level is not "strangling the economy." You act like I want to increase taxes to 70% when I'm simply proposing something that Sen Rick Scott wants. I know you have Boomer mentality and just want to kick the can down the road but we really need to think about the future.
Look, nothing would make me happier than to see working class on the streets, the inefficient mom and pop shops decimated, etc. However, things would have been SIGNIFICANTLY worse if we didn't have minor shut downs.
We are not living in normal economic times right now. Both the economy and the people are sandwiched between the covid era, supply chain issues and soaring inflation. There is a major war going on which has repercussions for the global commodity and food markets. Growth projections keep going down while inflation projections keep going up. So yes, in the current, extraordinary situation, tax hikes would almost surely strangle the economy and trigger a full-blown recession. If there ever was a time to kick the can down the road and ignore the deficit, it is now.
You keep acting like the current inflation woes were exclusively demand-driven: too much money in the hands of consumers. In reality, it's a combination of three factors: excess savings from the lockdown periods plus the stimulus programs, supply shortages as a result of disrupted supply chains and also higher producer prices due to higher costs for energy and raw materials. Increasing taxes would only tackle one of these three root causes of inflation while leaving the supply-side factors unaddressed.
-----------
On a more general note: do you think it will ever be possible for elected officials in the U.S. to get the people to accept significant and permanent reductions in their standard of living without being booted out of office at the next best opportunity? The last time a president argued that there's "nothing I can do about inflation and the struggling economy" and that the people might just have to "do with less", it led to a landslide loss and handed the other party the sovereignty on economic policy for 28 straight years. (On economic issues, president Clinton seamlessly continued the policies of Reagan/Bush Sr.)
This post was edited by Black XistenZ on May 16 2022 09:31pm