d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Coronavirus Thread
Prev1859860861862863910Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 21,486
Joined: Jul 21 2005
Gold: 438.40
Dec 22 2020 09:41am
Quote (theCrossbones @ 22 Dec 2020 07:35)
youre trying to disprove that the flu vaccine exists


The covid vaccine exists. Many many many forms of flu vaccines exist. Nobody has argued over the existence of these vaccines. What the fuck are you even talking about?
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Dec 22 2020 09:54am
Quote (InsaneBobb @ Dec 22 2020 09:32am)
No, if the vaccine's not going to prevent "reinfection" (the state of not only contracting the virus, but falling ill to it's effects rather than the immune system killing it before it can cause damage), then you've just talked yourself out of any reasonable request that those who don't want the vaccine should take it.

Literally nothing either one of you is arguing promotes the idea that the young and healthy should take the vaccine if they don't want to, and certainly none of it supports mandatory vaccination of any form.


Even if the risk is low for young people the risk from the vaccine is lower so its still a good idea to get vaccinated even if it's only effect is to prevent serious illness.

Whether or not anything justifies mandatory vaccination is an opinion. So I won't speak to that.
Member
Posts: 21,486
Joined: Jul 21 2005
Gold: 438.40
Dec 22 2020 10:00am
Quote (Thor123422 @ 22 Dec 2020 07:54)
Even if the risk is low for young people the risk from the vaccine is lower so its still a good idea to get vaccinated even if it's only effect is to prevent serious illness.

Whether or not anything justifies mandatory vaccination is an opinion. So I won't speak to that.


A good idea? For whom? You've indicated that those who've already had covid should get the vaccine, but turned around and indicated that the vaccine is no more effective at preventing "reinfection" than having already had the virus.

Do you see the circle you've talked yourself into? Serious illness for the young and healthy? Exceedingly rare. Chance for reinfection as anything more than an ordinary cold among the young and healthy the next cold/flu season? Unlikely and rare.

I mean, I'd simply take the win that we all agree that the elderly and high risk folks, as well as anyone else who WANTS it should certainly take the vaccine. Those who don't wish to take it shouldn't.

Exactly the same as the annual flu vaccinations. :)

This post was edited by InsaneBobb on Dec 22 2020 10:00am
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Dec 22 2020 10:06am
Quote (InsaneBobb @ Dec 22 2020 10:00am)
A good idea? For whom? You've indicated that those who've already had covid should get the vaccine, but turned around and indicated that the vaccine is no more effective at preventing "reinfection" than having already had the virus.

Do you see the circle you've talked yourself into? Serious illness for the young and healthy? Exceedingly rare. Chance for reinfection as anything more than an ordinary cold among the young and healthy the next cold/flu season? Unlikely and rare.

I mean, I'd simply take the win that we all agree that the elderly and high risk folks, as well as anyone else who WANTS it should certainly take the vaccine. Those who don't wish to take it shouldn't.

Exactly the same as the annual flu vaccinations. :)


I never said that one is better than the other at preventing reinfection. We don't know which is better. I said that the vaccine carries a lower risk than infection, so even if the only benefit of the vaccine is to prevent serious complications from infection it would still be a good idea for young people to take it.
Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 286.00
Dec 22 2020 10:06am
Quote (AutismBobb @ Dec 22 2020 10:18am)
You must be challenged. Seriously. Everything you are arguing argues even further AGAINST taking the vaccine, especially for young people.

The nature of the vaccine is to produce something in your body that tricks your immune system into thinking it knows the virus, so that your memory T Cells will recognize the virus and set about the process to kill it.

That doesn't mean the virus can't enter your body, that you won't test positive for it hundreds or potentially thousands of times following getting the vaccine or having caught the virus. What it means is that your body is prepared to respond to destroy the virus.

By promoting the theory that your immune system can't recognize the virus on further infection, all you're telling quite literally everyone is, "Neither catching the virus and recovering or getting a vaccine will keep you safe. It's never going away, and we're doomed."


Learn to read dumbass, lol.


Quote (AutismBobb @ Dec 22 2020 10:32am)
No, if the vaccine's not going to prevent "reinfection" (the state of not only contracting the virus, but falling ill to it's effects rather than the immune system killing it before it can cause damage), then you've just talked yourself out of any reasonable request that those who don't want the vaccine should take it.

Literally nothing either one of you is arguing promotes the idea that the young and healthy should take the vaccine if they don't want to, and certainly none of it supports mandatory vaccination of any form.


Quote (theCrossbones @ Dec 22 2020 10:35am)
youre trying to disprove that the flu vaccine exists


Everybody who took the original small pox vaccination has died. Makes you think.


Quote (AutismBobb @ Dec 22 2020 11:00am)
A good idea? For whom? You've indicated that those who've already had covid should get the vaccine, but turned around and indicated that the vaccine is no more effective at preventing "reinfection" than having already had the virus.

Do you see the circle you've talked yourself into? Serious illness for the young and healthy? Exceedingly rare. Chance for reinfection as anything more than an ordinary cold among the young and healthy the next cold/flu season? Unlikely and rare.

I mean, I'd simply take the win that we all agree that the elderly and high risk folks, as well as anyone else who WANTS it should certainly take the vaccine. Those who don't wish to take it shouldn't.

Exactly the same as the annual flu vaccinations. :)


"Prevents serious cases" means something. In particular hospital beds, which there are none available in a lot of major cities.

Back to reading comprehension basically. At least address what i said Mr. Rigid and lacking in tact.

This post was edited by Skinned on Dec 22 2020 10:10am
Member
Posts: 21,486
Joined: Jul 21 2005
Gold: 438.40
Dec 22 2020 10:16am
Quote (Thor123422 @ 22 Dec 2020 08:06)
I never said that one is better than the other at preventing reinfection. We don't know which is better. I said that the vaccine carries a lower risk than infection, so even if the only benefit of the vaccine is to prevent serious complications from infection it would still be a good idea for young people to take it.


That's fine! Promote that young people should take it if they want to! I support everyone's right to access. We agree!

You have consistently failed to make any case, however, that those who do not wish to take it (for whatever reason they have) OR those who've already caught and recovered from the virus should be browbeaten or forced to take it. :)
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Dec 22 2020 10:17am
Quote (InsaneBobb @ Dec 22 2020 10:16am)
That's fine! Promote that young people should take it if they want to! I support everyone's right to access. We agree!

You have consistently failed to make any case, however, that those who do not wish to take it (for whatever reason they have) OR those who've already caught and recovered from the virus should be browbeaten or forced to take it. :)


I have never made any case for that because I've never argued for that in any way shape or form.

Bro, calm down and read.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Dec 22 2020 10:18am
Member
Posts: 21,486
Joined: Jul 21 2005
Gold: 438.40
Dec 22 2020 10:24am
Quote (Thor123422 @ 22 Dec 2020 08:17)
I have never made any case for that because I've never argued for that in any way shape or form.

Bro, calm down and read.


My friend! Didn't you read back and determine what the conversation was about prior to "picking a side"? It's comments like this that are at the heart of the issue:

Quote (kenw @ 22 Dec 2020 04:46)
I just find it irresponsible not to get it when it becomes readily available. They should have a right to choose but in an ideal world where we had the tools to find anti vaxxers who manage to spread the disesase and cause death , the culprit should be charged accordingly.


I fully support people's right to vaccinations. I fully support the development of vaccinations. Hell, I highly encourage anyone who is part of a severe risk group to GET a vaccination.

Where I start to get pissed off is when you misrepresent the danger the virus poses to extremely low risk groups, and even the hint that virtually untested vaccinations should be mandatory, or people should somehow suddenly become responsible for other people catching a virus. This is what the conversation that you hopped into was about.

If you want to argue my posts, at least figure out what you're arguing for.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Dec 22 2020 10:28am
Quote (InsaneBobb @ Dec 22 2020 10:24am)
My friend! Didn't you read back and determine what the conversation was about prior to "picking a side"? It's comments like this that are at the heart of the issue:


I don't need to read back. You made very specific factual claims and I figured I'd chime in with why you were wrong on those. Reinfection because of waning immunity is a serious concern in a new disease and there is good reason for young people to get vaccinated even if its only function will be to reduce hospitalizations.

I'll repeat that I won't make a stance on mandatory vaccination because that's a values judgement.
Member
Posts: 21,486
Joined: Jul 21 2005
Gold: 438.40
Dec 22 2020 10:38am
Quote (Thor123422 @ 22 Dec 2020 08:28)
I don't need to read back. You made very specific factual claims and I figured I'd chime in with why you were wrong on those. Reinfection because of waning immunity is a serious concern in a new disease and there is good reason for young people to get vaccinated even if its only function will be to reduce hospitalizations.

I'll repeat that I won't make a stance on mandatory vaccination because that's a values judgement.


You crushed your own point though, didn't you? You directly said that it's not even known how long the vaccine will provide immunity, nor do you even have hard data on how long immunity lasts for those who catch it.

What we effectively see here is, "Covid is bad. It makes old and unhealthy people die. Here's a vaccine. It has had very limited testing and didn't exist prior to this year. Taking it may or may not prevent you for being a Covid carrier, may or may not provide immunity comparable to catching and recovering from the virus, and may or may not have some very uncomfortable side effects when you take it."

Just went and perused the hospitalization tracking, and it turns out, fewer than 1% of all hospitalizations of those under 30 with covid lack comorbidities. In other words, they're already in the higher risk group that should be encouraged (not forced) to take the vaccine.

You've failed to make any useful case, yet again.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1859860861862863910Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll