Again, everything you said is wrong. Impressive. The bolded is my favorite tho lol all you've done in this thread is ridicule other people's beliefs and I agree with you, your behavior is pathetic.
Unlike you, my aim is not to ridicule your beliefs, but to prove that we all believe in the same basic things. Refusing to tell me what you believe reveals just as much.
I can't believe you're sticking to your guns on gravity lol just google "is gravity a force?" And you will see every scientific resource says no. Newtonian physics has been proven wrong repeatedly for a hundred years. The only reason you know anything about Newtonian physics is because it's a simpler way of explaining the universe to small children, you aren't supposed to keep believing it when you grow up.
Again, utilizing centrifugal force is in no way "replicating gravity artificially". It's replicating centrifugal force artificially.
Well the laws of physics do seem to behave in a predictable way at least as far back as cmb, but this relies on the point of observation. Lack of time symmetry is what changes the laws of physics, violating conservation. If you travel to that other system and do all of your experiments there, there will be time symmetry and conservation will hold true just as it does here. It is only between systems(on a cosmological scale) that time symmetry breaks down. And possibly before cmb.
It's not actually ai. It's just an advanced search function. But yes, it uses your searches to figure out what you want to hear and then it tells you that. The more you use it, the better it gets at telling you exactly what you want to hear. You can literally make it say anything you want, just like you can find whatever you want on duckduckgo, even things which are not true. The only way to prevent this is to apply arbitrary filters(censorship), which every major public ai developer does to some extent.
If you aren't here to prove if god is real then you are in the wrong thread bud. I am testing the logic and validity of christian beliefs here and instead of acknowledging that they are ridiculous, illogical and proofless they double down and engage in whataboutism.
This is a concession that you have abandoned your weak baseless argument and in a bitter attempt of cope you deflect with yea but but what about gravity cry cry cry....
Which part of the my beliefs are irrelevant to proving christian beliefs did you not understand? My personal opinion on gravity right or wrong shouldn't in any way influence you to provide me the validity if magical jesus existed and the claim there was a 950 year old man who gathered 2 of every kind of animal onto a boat and survived a global flood for like a year. So either stick to the topic or bounce
doesnt your belief hold up? its only fair if you attack someones belief you should have a better alternative. if you cant provide one it makes you look unreasonable
You know you failed to prove your beliefs so you begin coping and attack other people's beliefs/character in retaliation.
Yea but your belief doesn't provide an alternative
Yea but your belief might be wrong
Yea but you are unreasonable bla bla bla
When will you get - this isn't about belief comparisons who is more right or less right which belief has more proof.
No this is about proving your own and if you cannot then you need to acknowledge that they are fake. But you can't do that because you would be embarrassed, which means you prioritize your feelings over truth.
If you would like to make a separate topic on my personal beliefs we can discuss them there otherwise stop deflecting from your own.
This post was edited by addone on Feb 16 2026 01:41pm