Im sure you have suddenly turned into Bolton the "disgruntled employee" correct?
Then to be followed by.
I don't know him
He's not my lawyer.
I just took pictures with him
You have to ask Rudy..
Right?

What fact could the whistle-blower testify to that is specifically relevant to Trump's motivations or actions? If he doesn't have any then he isn't relevant to the case. End of story.

Maybe if he takes a magic sharpie and draws a picture of what the whistleblower looks like that would help.

Considering he was the start up for the impeachment process, he's pretty damn relevant. As is Hunter Biden. Maybe not in the context of a criminal court is Hunter relevant. But this isn't a criminal court, and it's far more political.

The charges were weak from the start. And now you're going to complain that they have to unwillingly comply with everything Schiff demands?

Not how it works either. That would be a corrupt process.

They voted on the witnesses. It got denied.

This post was edited by GLYC123 on Feb 2 2020 10:45am

What's that? The whistle-blower cannot establish anything relevant to the trial? Glad you finally admit it.

By partisan people unwilling to do the right thing. AHHH. The house is political.. at least you are not crying about due process..
HOWEVER the Senate is a trial. Without the ability to bring witness/certain documents. IE Due Process waay too much Fox news floating around daily.

You're pretty arrogant, a good example of why people move away from the Democratic party.

That's nice.

I'm pretty much done with you lol. I've given you three separate conversations separated by over a week and you always do the same thing. You just aren't able to follow a thread when the conclusion goes somewhere you don't like. You end up taking the conversation in circles because straight lines lead to uncomfortable conclusions.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Feb 2 2020 11:53am

Right, keep thinking that way. You refuse to acknowledge any flaw in what you say (and there's been many). I at least can admit when I don't have every answer, and am capable of acknowledging another perspective.

You're the exact reason why people would rather hang out and drink beer with a Trump voter that will say "Yeah, he tweets and says dumb shit but at least he has some good policy", without trying to attack someone for having a different political view and that is capable of agreeing to disagree. Those are the people individuals would actually like to be associated with.

So. Thanks for promoting Trump!

I definitely don't have ever answer, I don't follow this stuff nearly as closely as I used to. I just don't have that kind of time anymore. Thing is, I've been waiting for you to jump on the many points I'm ignorant on, but you haven't. I'm not some wall of arrogance that will never admit ignorance or fault, it's just that in this conversation you've been unable to find legitimate holes in my arguments.

However, there's a few points I've made that are really obvious even without having a full grasp of the situation, and these points are acknowledged by pretty much every Trump supporter on the forum except you and maybe one other person.
1. The whistleblower would not have testimony relevant to the case.
2. Republicans are preventing witnesses with relevant information from coming in.
3. Trump's primary motivation for his investigation was for personal political gains.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Feb 2 2020 12:16pm