d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate >
Poll > Trump 2016 > Trump Vs Clinton
Prev18388398408418423169Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 53,338
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Oct 2 2016 10:04am
Quote (IgoSoHard @ 2 Oct 2016 11:58)
If it's on her campaign website it must be true, I mean it also says she's honest & trustworthy :rofl:


HfA blatantly lying in the headline too :rofl: nonetheless - how dare someone take advantage of the tax law (laws that are the result of elected officials and their policies, such as Se(c) Clinton herself)
meanwhile Bernie is doubling down on Hillary (C)linton calling his supporters basement dwellers who are too stupid to figure out how to get a job in this horrid economy :lol:

e: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

http://www.forbes.com/sites/jeffreydorfman/2016/01/31/new-york-times-hypocrisy-on-corporate-taxes-reaches-record-high/#8ab10b065775

Code
for tax year 2014, The New York Times paid no taxes and got an income tax refund of $3.5 million even though they had a pre-tax profit of $29.9 million in 2014. In other words, their post-tax profit was higher than their pre-tax profit. The explanation in their 2014 annual report is, “The effective tax rate for 2014 was favorably affected by approximately $21.1 million for the reversal of reserves for uncertain tax positions due to the lapse of applicable statutes of limitations.


looks like the NYSlimes has no issue with following the legal provisions in the tax code to use prior period losses to offset future gains

This post was edited by excellence on Oct 2 2016 10:13am
Member
Posts: 63,033
Joined: Jul 15 2005
Gold: 152.00
Oct 2 2016 10:05am
Quote (IgoSoHard @ Oct 2 2016 11:58am)
If it's on her campaign website it must be true, I mean it also says she's honest & trustworthy :rofl:


Which part are you questioning? That the New York Times report exists?
Member
Posts: 30,815
Joined: Mar 12 2008
Gold: 252.29
Oct 2 2016 10:17am
Quote (excellence @ Oct 2 2016 04:04pm)
HfA blatantly lying in the headline too :rofl: nonetheless - how dare someone take advantage of the tax law (laws that are the result of elected officials and their policies, such as Se(c) Clinton herself)
meanwhile Bernie is doubling down on Hillary (C)linton calling his supporters basement dwellers who are too stupid to figure out how to get a job in this horrid economy :lol:

e: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

http://www.forbes.com/sites/jeffreydorfman/2016/01/31/new-york-times-hypocrisy-on-corporate-taxes-reaches-record-high/#8ab10b065775

Code
for tax year 2014, The New York Times paid no taxes and got an income tax refund of $3.5 million even though they had a pre-tax profit of $29.9 million in 2014. In other words, their post-tax profit was higher than their pre-tax profit. The explanation in their 2014 annual report is, “The effective tax rate for 2014 was favorably affected by approximately $21.1 million for the reversal of reserves for uncertain tax positions due to the lapse of applicable statutes of limitations.


looks like the NYSlimes has no issue with following provisions in the tax code to use prior period losses to offset future gains


Yeah but they donated to and work for the hildebeast so obviously they are not racist.
Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 285.00
Oct 2 2016 10:21am
Quote (IgoSoHard @ Oct 2 2016 10:58am)
If it's on her campaign website it must be true, I mean it also says she's honest & trustworthy :rofl:


Yeah, because the IRS is so dishonest about public information.

Keep buying that snake oil.

Quote (Voyaging @ Oct 2 2016 11:05am)
Which part are you questioning? That the New York Times report exists?


They don't question anything.

This post was edited by Skinned on Oct 2 2016 10:22am
Member
Posts: 10,049
Joined: Aug 11 2014
Gold: 540.00
Oct 2 2016 12:10pm
Member
Posts: 1,606
Joined: Jul 26 2006
Gold: 0.00
Oct 2 2016 12:34pm
Quote (Voyaging @ Jul 18 2015 12:26pm)
I'm seriously so sick of hearing about Trump already; he's a fringe candidate who stands no chance at getting the nomination. He's this year's Ron Paul (gets tons of attention on the internet but loses by a landslide).


Boy did you really shit the bed with that prediction.
Member
Posts: 20,576
Joined: May 31 2010
Gold: 0.00
Oct 2 2016 12:36pm
Quote (sparky303 @ Oct 2 2016 02:34pm)
Boy did you really shit the bed with that prediction.


Wow someone cares enough to post with their multi
Member
Posts: 64,732
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 260.11
Oct 2 2016 12:37pm
Quote (sparky303 @ Oct 2 2016 12:34pm)
Boy did you really shit the bed with that prediction.


Boy has that post been brought up 20 times already.
Member
Posts: 11,264
Joined: Sep 8 2006
Gold: 0.00
Oct 2 2016 01:02pm
The real story is that Republicans want to elect someone whose businesses declared bankruptcy 6-8 times (having your rich dad buy 3.5 million of casino chips and never use them is kind of a bail out), who runs sham foundations and organizations, stiffs contractors and other businessmen, AND who posted a 915 MILLION DOLLAR LOSS in one year.

You want him as the CEO of the U.S.?
Member
Posts: 48,827
Joined: Jun 18 2006
Gold: 5,016.77
Oct 2 2016 01:08pm
Quote (Interesting @ Oct 2 2016 02:02pm)
The real story is that Republicans want to elect someone whose businesses declared bankruptcy 6-8 times (having your rich dad buy 3.5 million of casino chips and never use them is kind of a bail out), who runs sham foundations and organizations, stiffs contractors and other businessmen, AND who posted a 915 MILLION DOLLAR LOSS in one year.

You want him as the CEO of the U.S.?


He managed to maintain billions in wealth(Forbes is 3.4 billion I believe), but I don't accept the argument that successful businessmen know more about the economy. I think the most brilliant minds in economics probably never had a large business.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev18388398408418423169Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll