d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > The Mueller Report
Prev18283848586173Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Views: 20378Replies: 1723Track Topic
Member
Posts: 33,927
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
#831
Apr 18 2019 10:28am
Thats it. I guess were impeaching
Member
Posts: 49,289
Joined: Jun 18 2006
Gold: 11.77
#832
Apr 18 2019 10:31am
Quote (EndlessSky @ Apr 18 2019 11:28am)
Thats it. I guess were impeaching


If Obama or Hillary had engaged in the same behavior that Trump did, you and every cultist here would support impeachment.
Member
Posts: 38,137
Joined: May 28 2006
Gold: 0.00
#833
Apr 18 2019 10:32am
Quote (Pelosi @ Schumer)
We believe the only way to begin restoring public trust in the handling of the Special Counsel’s investigation is for Special Counsel Mueller himself to provide public testimony in the House and Senate as soon as possible.


at what point exactly did handling of the investigation lose trust ?

why arent any leftist shitting about such treasonos distrust & betrayal of the US InTeLlIgEnCe CoMmUnItY and its verdict ??

https://www.speaker.gov/newsroom/41819/


Member
Posts: 49,289
Joined: Jun 18 2006
Gold: 11.77
#834
Apr 18 2019 10:44am




Member
Posts: 33,927
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
#835
Apr 18 2019 10:51am
Quote (IceMage @ Apr 18 2019 11:31am)
If Obama or Hillary had engaged in the same behavior that Trump did, you and every cultist here would support impeachment.


What behavior? They didnt investigate anything
Member
Posts: 26,025
Joined: Jun 14 2006
Gold: 5,300.00
Warn: 10%
#836
Apr 18 2019 10:52am
Quote (Goomshill @ Apr 18 2019 11:10am)
k finished reading volume I, nothing new



Honestly after reading the sections on Jeff Sessions and "things of value", you could have known what was in this report by reading my jsp posts :S
/e I am very disappointed that whereas other sections delved very deeply into the prosecutiorial discretion and best interests served, they completely ignore any considerations in the section on Michael Flynn. Just flat out, no mention of the meta-considerations like intra-departmental cooperation, fairness, the legitimate reasons he might have to not share sensitive geopolitical maneuvers with those with no need to know, etc. Although perhaps this was hidden in one of those redacted blocks of text?

very likely. there's still quite a bit on-going that we don't even know about.
Member
Posts: 70,459
Joined: Feb 3 2006
Gold: 28,299.69
#837
Apr 18 2019 10:54am
Quote (IceMage @ Apr 18 2019 09:44am)
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D4cuQznW4AEMO9f.png



https://media.giphy.com/media/HPPo897APrNh6/giphy.gif




5 words that can sum up so much
Member
Posts: 50,903
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,836.00
#838
Apr 18 2019 10:54am
the flynn parts in volume II definitely lay out 100% that the FBI was intentionally setting a perjury trap for Flynn
He had already gone on the record publicly, in pressure to journalists and talking to Pence denying that he had discussed sanctions with Kisylak, when the FBI team consciously decided to asked him about it on the record on the stated reasoning that because Russia could prove he talked to them about sanctions, it gave them leverage over him. Nevermind any reasons why sensitive diplomatic channels like this could be legitimately kept secret. So its laid out very clearly on page 30 volume 2 that the FBI did indeed set out to purposefully trap Flynn in a false statement on something they already knew he could not tell them the truth about
Member
Posts: 26,025
Joined: Jun 14 2006
Gold: 5,300.00
Warn: 10%
#839
Apr 18 2019 10:58am
Quote (Beowulf @ Apr 18 2019 11:54am)
https://i.imgur.com/QjdaxeV.png

5 words that can sum up so much

just like the start of this investigation.

horowitz come show the light

This post was edited by tagged4nothing on Apr 18 2019 10:59am
Member
Posts: 49,289
Joined: Jun 18 2006
Gold: 11.77
#840
Apr 18 2019 11:02am
Quote (Goomshill @ Apr 18 2019 11:54am)
the flynn parts in volume II definitely lay out 100% that the FBI was intentionally setting a perjury trap for Flynn
He had already gone on the record publicly, in pressure to journalists and talking to Pence denying that he had discussed sanctions with Kisylak, when the FBI team consciously decided to asked him about it on the record on the stated reasoning that because Russia could prove he talked to them about sanctions, it gave them leverage over him. Nevermind any reasons why sensitive diplomatic channels like this could be legitimately kept secret. So its laid out very clearly on page 30 volume 2 that the FBI did indeed set out to purposefully trap Flynn in a false statement on something they already knew he could not tell them the truth about


If Flynn didn't want to reveal what he talked with the Russian ambassador about during the transition, he could've just told the FBI to buzz off. Intentionally lying to investigators was stupid.... and the FBI had every reason to be interested in those talks.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev18283848586173Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll

© 2003-2026 d2jsp  Contact