Gold

http://www.cnn.com/2016/09/28/opinions/trumps-america-no-fat-chicks-filipovic/index.html

Fair and balanced lmao

This post was edited by Skinned on Sep 28 2016 05:59pm

wow, seldom do I see such a legit comment in any comment section!

CNN, lmao they seemed to have no issue with her weight gain being a topic back in 1997:

http://www.cnn.com/WORLD/9701/29/fringe/miss.universe/

Expanding Miss Universe works to shed pounds
January 29, 1997
Web posted at: 4:15 p.m. EST (2115 GMT)
From Correspondent Jeanne Moos

NEW YORK (CNN) -- When Alicia Machado of Venezuela was named Miss Universe nine months ago, no one could accuse her of being the size of the universe. But as her universe expanded, so did she, putting on nearly 60 pounds....
Rumors also surfaced that she might be forced to give up her Miss Universe crown...
But Trump, as co-owner of rights to the pageant, said he would never let that happen.

Why do you think any of that is important here? I see his top surrogates and even his disgraced ex-campaign manager who's still shilling for him on CNN (absolutely the most pathetic hire in the history of broadcast journalism) trying to justify Trump's comments and further attack her, and now dredge up elements of her past to go full-on character assassination; it's hilarious how badly they've misjudged this. The issue is that Trump called the woman "Miss Piggy" and "Miss Housekeeping." There isn't a justification for Trump's comments, in this or any of the other hundred instances where he's said something indefensible.

That his campaign is trying to justify his insults by noting her weight gain or anything else about her in the past... these idiots. I don't know how on Earth I got so lucky as to have so many clients share a ballot with this moron, regardless if he could somehow find a way to convince enough other morons to vote him into the White House, but holy shit this is the stuff of dreams coming true.

character assassination is all (C)linton campaign has - started against Sanders in the primary, e: actually started against President Barack Obama in the 2008 primaries. can't run on 30 years of getting nothing done, or emerging from the white house broke and being now worth 9 figures despite :zero: private sector work (and 11+ years in government positions paid by the taxpayer). deal with it buddy.
maybe stick to the coffee runs champ, just don't forget the sugar, may help offset how bitter you are everytime you cry on here.

obligatory: thanks for another fucking laugh!

This post was edited by excellence on Sep 29 2016 01:07pm

It's so unfair, the way that she brings up things that he said and did.

This is nonsensical. Clinton didn't even air a negative ad against Sanders in the primary, and she routinely lavished him with praise; in fact her entire electoral argument was "Senator Sanders is a nice man who has the right ideals we share, but I'm the only one who can actually achieve them."

Clinton has an incredible record of achievement both inside and outside of government. Trying to pretend it doesn't exist because you're ignorant of legislative history, and because it's easier for you to mischaracterize some of the comments she's made over the span of a quarter-century in the public arena, makes you look like a clown. I don't know why you'd bother with projection, either. That was a really odd choice.

Trump raised around 18 million dollars in the 24 hour period following the debate

http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2016/09/27/trump-raises-17-million-in-debate-timed-fundraising-push/

~

Trump has had around 300,000 people attend his rallies since August 1st. Which is about a staggering 25x the amount Clinton has drawn.

Take the first two weeks of August for example.

Trump:
Number of events: 18
Total estimated attendance: 100,000
Average estimated attendance: 5,000

Clinton:
Number of events: 8
Total estimated attendance: 12,000
Average estimated attendance: 1,500



Interesting