Sorry, you're right, that was poor wording.

Affidavits are not particularly convincing evidence, even if I assumed they are being totally truthful.

A sworn statement can be the impetus to gather more evidence of voter fraud actually happening, but alone are not enough to take action on. I fully support opening a real investigation to gather evidence of voter fraud actually occurring, but sworn statements on their own do not meet the bar to disqualify ballots unless it's maybe from someone that maybe is personally testifying that they committed voter fraud.

Conveniently omitting discovery process, 11,000+ witnesses, and like 600+ sworn affidavits. I guess they are all lying..

Nothing to see here? You missed the affidvits where they agree to make sworn testimony? Did you miss the affidavit with Dominion IT Tech whistle blower?

This post was edited by Jere on Nov 14 2020 10:08pm

The discovery process has literally not taken place yet. Discovery is something that takes months and is initiated after the case has been shown to have merit. It's something in which the courts actively give order to turn over documents and evidence is gathered. Just saying "omitting the discovery process" shows you have no clue how literally anything in the court process works.

Anybody can make a sworn testimony about anything. Especially when it's done through an online portal and you know nobody is ever going to track you down for lieing.

sworn testimony

Man, it's tough to talk to people who aren't looking things up like laws...

Why do you keep trying to find any reason to dispute there is something irregular going on here?

Tell me more BS about sworn statements that aren't true..

https://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/s602.html

This post was edited by Jere on Nov 14 2020 10:13pm

They have to swear its true, but that doesnt make it true dumbass.

Theres alao a ton of room between "something irregular" and "nationwide voter fraud ring"

Well recently you were saying stuff like Trump is fraud, I'm consipiracy theroist and now you're trying so hard to kill any narrative of possible widespread fraud by NOT looking anything up and attempting to CLAIM 600+ affidavits and 11,000+ people are lying in some way.

Just look for yourself. Stop gaslighting

This post was edited by Jere on Nov 14 2020 10:21pm

You are a conspiracy theorist lol

I'm absolutely trying to kill the narrative of widespread fraud because it hasn't been proven, and when questioned in court even the lawyers claiming fraud are having to walk their statements back to the point where they are admitting they have no evidence of any fraud.

I've given you every courtesy, to the point of relying exclusively on your posted sources, and you still couldn't meet the burden of proof.

Didn't I explain the misdirection earlier there and link it?

Not voter fraud, election fraud. Media misdirection. LOOK JUST LOOK MAN.

They will tell you about a few lawsuits being thrown which are completely misrepresented and MENTION NOTHING ELSE You won't even check for yourself..

Are you afraid of what you might find?

This post was edited by Jere on Nov 14 2020 10:35pm

I just have a job and responsibilities so I'm not going to read conspiracy garbage. I came into this giving you every opportunity to prove your case and you failed spectacularly to the point where even your own sources didn't support your claims.

Breaking: https://nypost.com/2020/11/14/biden-cancer-initiative-spent-millions-on-payroll-zero-on-research-report/?utm_source=twitter_sitebuttons&utm_medium=site%20buttons&utm_campaign=site%20buttons

Your whole world caving in?