Quote (majorblood @ Nov 8 2016 12:50am)

that's a given

Quote (serialj0e @ Nov 7 2016 09:04pm)

U give people candy

Quote (majorblood @ Nov 7 2016 06:50pm)

that's a given

Quote (card_sultan @ Nov 7 2016 09:37pm)

so force x time = momentum still (in English)

or more specifically "delta" time & "delta" momentum

but you thought you could sound more "science-y" by mentioning the specific math notation of a "change" in momentum while not mentioning the specific math notation for a "change" in time.

gotcha......

anyway - I know you think Newton did this math that proved the planet has "gravity" even though he even said it was pretty stupid and then Einstein said - no the planet doesn't have gravity - space is curved but along came NASA and they gave you a nice picture and its proved cause you saw the picture right?

So really the whole thing is based on a picture from NASA and this is why people rage when you question NASA.

Have you seen the video proof for 2 + 2 + 5? Its proved by math - you can even google it. Can you explain that, cause 2 + 2 aint 5.

Here's a nice video that shows we cant be spinning at 1000 mph, its funny stuff when you actually start waking up to the truth.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zx8L-CcDzCI

Quote (majorblood @ Nov 7 2016 07:45pm)

no the problem with saying "force * time = momentum" is that it doesn't take into account momentum that exists without force i.e. constant velocity
take an object that weighs 5kg traveling at a constant velocity of 1m/s for 10 seconds it would have a momentum of 5 kgm/s.
If you were to apply it to your formula of f*t = p then you'd get 0*10 = 5 which is not a true statement. There is no change of momentum in the above example but a momentum exists.
I am not trying to sound "science-y" I am trying to educate the uneducated. I genuinely think you learned something new today.
i'm not reading the rest

Quote (majorblood @ Nov 7 2016 04:13pm)

force + time =/= "the change" in momentum
force*time = Δp

the whole time you've been saying force * time = momentum which is not true in all cases as momentum can exist without force in equivalence with newton's first law

Quote (card_sultan @ Nov 7 2016 10:42pm)

"uneducated" - saying delta momentum without mentioning that you also need to clarify that u need delta time
like you did.....



There might be hope for you still but i could be hoping for to much.

Quote (majorblood @ Nov 7 2016 08:48pm)

delta time is redundant

Quote (moonmidnight @ Nov 7 2016 09:02pm)

Card_Sultan are you wearing a hat made of Aluminium foil ?

Quote (card_sultan @ Nov 7 2016 10:56pm)

as opposed to an instant of time, if your going to be technical - you should try to be exact at least.

Quote (moonmidnight @ Nov 7 2016 11:02pm)

Card_Sultan are you wearing a hat made of Aluminium foil ?