d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Elon Musk Now Twitter's Big Shareholder
Prev18081828384113Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 25,139
Joined: Dec 20 2006
Gold: 82,014.68
Warn: 10%
Dec 3 2022 07:29pm
Quote (Meanwhile @ Dec 3 2022 04:58pm)



the left definitely Eft him.
doesnt matter though they needed to make you think billionaires are stupid since bill gates lost his vaccine poker face when he drank during Brussels interview

now hes an AJ spider meme b4 AJ was defunded by C1A.
Member
Posts: 46,938
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
Dec 3 2022 07:32pm
Quote (lodd222 @ Dec 3 2022 05:23pm)
didnt know you liked bird piss.


ha :) REEEEEEING pissed twiters
Member
Posts: 34,649
Joined: Jul 2 2007
Gold: 273.37
Dec 3 2022 08:18pm
Quote (IceMage @ Dec 3 2022 06:51pm)
Uh, maybe you could make an argument, instead of relying on the authority of an institution you obviously don't value.

I think allowing Twitter to have mechanisms for allowing discussions around certain important subjects is fine. Limiting disinformation is actually important, no matter what others say.


The question is whether he deserved to be banned from Twitter. Twitter has rules to determine that. He didn't violate the rules, ergo, he shouldn't be banned. I didn't think we were getting into whether or not Twitter has good rules or bad rules. That's way too broad.

Limiting disinformation is a great policy objective, the tricky part is figuring out how to do that without censoring information, and that's often been the case. How do we allow people to talk about Covid-19, for instance, but only talk about what's "true", when we have no idea what's true or not at that point in time? That's more ambitious than I think any government is set-up for.
Member
Posts: 22,264
Joined: Aug 17 2021
Gold: 1,546.83
Warn: 30%
Dec 3 2022 08:23pm
Quote (bogie160 @ Dec 3 2022 06:18pm)
The question is whether he deserved to be banned from Twitter. Twitter has rules to determine that. He didn't violate the rules, ergo, he shouldn't be banned. I didn't think we were getting into whether or not Twitter has good rules or bad rules. That's way too broad.

Limiting disinformation is a great policy objective, the tricky part is figuring out how to do that without censoring information, and that's often been the case. How do we allow people to talk about Covid-19, for instance, but only talk about what's "true", when we have no idea what's true or not at that point in time? That's more ambitious than I think any government is set-up for.


I feel that for Twitter to be able to ban certain viewpoints for being "disinformation", they are stifling debates and keeping the users in a state of ignorance. Twitter should only worry about providing the platform, and let people hash it out, and let the public at large be the judge as to what is true disinfo and what isn't.
Member
Posts: 42,679
Joined: Jul 8 2008
Gold: 8,000.00
Dec 4 2022 02:35am
Quote (bogie160 @ Dec 3 2022 09:18pm)
The question is whether he deserved to be banned from Twitter. Twitter has rules to determine that. He didn't violate the rules, ergo, he shouldn't be banned. I didn't think we were getting into whether or not Twitter has good rules or bad rules. That's way too broad.

Limiting disinformation is a great policy objective, the tricky part is figuring out how to do that without censoring information, and that's often been the case. How do we allow people to talk about Covid-19, for instance, but only talk about what's "true", when we have no idea what's true or not at that point in time? That's more ambitious than I think any government is set-up for.


the public just siding with Pfizer and Moderna when they both made 10+ billion from their vaccines is bizarre, when pharma companies were hated prior to covid
Member
Posts: 34,649
Joined: Jul 2 2007
Gold: 273.37
Dec 4 2022 08:31am
Quote (KrWWW @ Dec 4 2022 03:35am)
the public just siding with Pfizer and Moderna when they both made 10+ billion from their vaccines is bizarre, when pharma companies were hated prior to covid


Another impact of extreme polarization. If a Republican politician or blogger somewhere says something bad about big pharma, Democrats will line up to insist that the exact opposite is true, and if that means lionizing pharma, and handing them a blank cheque of credulity to do what's in pharma's financial interests, then so be it.
Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Dec 4 2022 08:57am
Quote (lodd222 @ 4 Dec 2022 02:29)
the left definitely Eft him.
doesnt matter though they needed to make you think billionaires are stupid since bill gates lost his vaccine poker face when he drank during Brussels interview

now hes an AJ spider meme b4 AJ was defunded by C1A.


This ?



I think it's violence and stupid to do that. Not sure he deserved it. Maybe, maybe not.
Member
Posts: 46,938
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
Dec 4 2022 08:59am
Quote (Meanwhile @ Dec 4 2022 06:57am)
This ?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iK6SS8CXYZo

I think it's violence and stupid to do that. Not sure he deserved it. Maybe, maybe not.


dude is a depop guy if your looking for violence
Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Dec 4 2022 09:07am
Quote (TiStuff @ 4 Dec 2022 15:59)
dude is a depop guy if your looking for violence


scary theories

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/bill-gates-depopulation/

Really scary, and false. But maybe he deserved a pie on face for his monopoly on Operating System.
Especially when i see that i have to run dedicated scripts to debloat my own windows.
Member
Posts: 46,938
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
Dec 4 2022 09:13am
Quote (Meanwhile @ Dec 4 2022 07:07am)
scary theories

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/bill-gates-depopulation/

Really scary, and false. But maybe he deserved a pie on face for his monopoly on Operating System.
Especially when i see that i have to run dedicated scripts to debloat my own windows.


the dude was depop long before the "vaccinations"
but if you want to think he all of a sudden become the humanitarian then go and think that.

another tidbit?
somebody names themselves "fact checkers" so that automatically make them the most honest ever ever in whole world..........c'mon maaan
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev18081828384113Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll