how about articulating your rebuttal like a grown up bud

We'll have Charlie Kirk getting blasted for another thousand years guy.

Kill a hundred protesters. Kill a million. And we'll always have Kirk. And then we'll have another. Because you think killing protestors is a victory.

Your comparison to Kyle Rittenhouse is nonsensical, both situations are totally distinct as he didn’t fight with law enforcement. Your turn.

I contend that Alex did not "fight" law enforcement. If you use the word impede you might have more of an argument.

Describe the nature of his fight. Did he draw his gun? Did he hit them?

Kristi Noem aint gonna have a job next year

kEK

The vast majority of this thread (hell probably most threads in PARD) are folks arguing in bad faith fwiw.

I know, but some are just absurd about it. It’s impressive to witness how idelogy can actually make people so detached from reality.

I think the hypocrisy is that the administrations position is that he was obviously there to commit violence because he (Alex) was armed. That’s regarded and doesn’t make sense if you think Kyle Rittenhouse wasn’t obviously there prepared for committing violence openly carrying an AR-15.

Explain how this is detached from reality? From the video it appears that ICE escalated the aggression while Alex is actively trying to keep his hands above his head.

It sounds like you've gaslit yourself to believe whatever you think is true and whoever disagrees with you is automatically in the wrong.

It's because he was both armed and attacked law enforcement

If he wasn't armed he would have just been wrangled. If he didn't attack them nothing would have happened. Lesson here is don't attack LEOs and especially not while armed

What specific actions can you describe when you say he attacked law enforcement? From the video I don't see him putting hands on law enforcement or drawing his gun?