d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > But What About The Rights Of The Unborn?
Prev1789
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 61,687
Joined: Mar 14 2006
Gold: 28.77
May 13 2022 01:02am
Quote (Ephesians61213 @ May 12 2022 10:57pm)
Nah, bruh, it's a straw man that your side has created out of ignorance. People can intentionally create straw men or they can unintentionally create straw men. And based on your post history, you appear to be one of the people who don't understand basic biology.


Here's the thing: you guys stopped learning biology after 10th grade. You only know basic biology. Most of us have college level understanding or even advanced degrees and careers in biology. You folks should really learn your place. Your ignorance isn't better than our education and experience.
Member
Posts: 47,100
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
May 13 2022 02:33am
why would/should a leftie atheist/antitheist believe in any kind of rights for any reason?

Quote (Saucisson6000 @ May 12 2022 12:45pm)
People doing this are quickly terminated


what if its a tranny doing it? wouldnt that just be a girl fight............
Member
Posts: 4,498
Joined: Feb 1 2012
Gold: 2,665.00
May 13 2022 03:59am
They're aborting people they're assuming haven't identified as being born already.

It's a messed up world.
Member
Posts: 3,692
Joined: May 9 2007
Gold: 16,045.00
May 13 2022 06:14am
Quote (Slowtoanger @ May 12 2022 06:58pm)
What I find interesting is that biologists community would agree that (not everyone of them but seems like a good chunk) would affirm that life begins at conception but it seems to be tossed aside to be debated more on the philosophical side of the issue.

But if I understand the prochoice correctly, it shouldn't even matter if life begins at conceptions and it is indeed a life, the choice of the currently living (the woman) is far more philosophically important or greater than the "baby" in HER womb. Correct me if I'm wrong on that.


The hair analogy was pretty stupid, the argument I hardly ever see come up that is much closer to the abortion debate is that of organ donation. You cannot be forced to donate an organ, or even blood for that matter, that could save someone's life because it is your body. That person whose life you could save does not override your choice to do what you want with your body. You can even decide to not donate a promised organ right up until the time of the operation to remove it. Mid operation or after it is out you cant request it back. However, if some back alley criminal steals your organ and gets caught right after you have every right to get your organ back. And that is the basis for the argument that in the case of rape it is without a doubt within the womans right to abort the child pretty much at any stage of the pregnancy in my opinion. It just creates an environment where dealing with false rape claims may be an even bigger issue then it already is.

The first debate is that the woman (and so did the man and I think more should be done to hold men accountable in this matter) made multiple choices before the pregnancy occurred (to not use birth control, to actually have sex, to not use any other form of protection, etc.) and took on the risks involved of potential pregnancy. And at some stage of pregnancy it is similar to the operation to remove an organ already being in motion and the woman had made her choice that she can not back away from now.

This then leaves the other debate of when does the baby become a baby and have the basic right to life?

Conception? (debatable)
When the brain begins to develop?
When there is a heart beat?
When there is a reaction to stimuli/pain?
When the baby is viable? Can it survive outside the womb on medical equipment the rest of the pregnancy?
When it can survive completely on its own outside of the womb but is not yet born?
Right at the time of birth? (I think most would agree the baby has the right to life sometime well before this point).

Ultimately the issue is far more complicated than either side really wants to admit, and because of that overturning Roe v Wade and leaving this issue to the states and their elected officials makes a lot of sense.

Quote (DidNotKillSelf @ May 13 2022 12:56am)



No that's not the question. That's the word games of leftists.

Personhood = identity politics


No scientist would say personhood is a scientific argument. It's a social argument. And social arguments are opinions and mostly exagerated when the big social issues are solved: racism, sexism, theft.

Legality about when is a citizen a citizen is the actual argument. Not what is human or life. Thats a fake argument/distraction.

Technically written word of the constitution sides with pro-abortionists in the word "born citizen" but contradicts itself with right to life liberty etc. But i never said America's constitution is the final formula for human rights. It's a work in progress.

Life has no criteria of definition besides movement/animation.
And what is defined as homosapien is clear: DNA.
We protect homosapiens, is what I hope a government of homosapiens does.


I never understand this, citizenship has nothing to do with this. I can't go around killing immigrants because they aren't citizens. Hell even dog fighting is illegal, I can't go around adopting dogs and murdering them for fun under the argument that they are my property now. The original intent of the born part of the 14th amendment was to grant citizenship to native Americans who did not have legal citizenship at the time. In the same vein, the whole anchor baby thing is a misinterpretation of the 14th amendment as well. It was never the intent to grant citizenship to illegal immigrant babies, though the idea of illegal immigrants was not a thing when it was originally written. However, we did not, and never have, granted citizenship to foreign ambassadors who have babies in the USA.

Member
Posts: 8,552
Joined: Jul 25 2020
Gold: 1,760.00
May 13 2022 09:08am
Quote (inkanddagger @ May 13 2022 12:02am)
Here's the thing: you guys stopped learning biology after 10th grade. You only know basic biology. Most of us have college level understanding or even advanced degrees and careers in biology. You folks should really learn your place. Your ignorance isn't better than our education and experience.


I already know your place: you are a cultist, powerless but needy for control. All hail the church of science. No, no more sarcasm. My leader is not basic.

I see no difference between you and jamestown and waco, just less extreme, but same goofyness. Cult = little mini culture. Same same:
Trans is a cult. Maga is a cult. Culty televangelists. BLM is a cult. KKK is a cult. Gay parades are full of cultists, but gay does not equal cult. Unthinking sheep that walk into college for money and from cultural pressure thinking they have education instead of hebrew/judeo opinions are likely to be cultists. Because kids vulnerable to propaganda.

University kids are gullible. Easily manipulated. It's hilarity to ask opinions of a university student. You just expect comedy.

Don't you realize? You swallowed somebody else's ideas. Same as a catholic choir boy Ephesians.

But the university cult is superior, because institutions and ceremonies and certifications... wait... hmmm...?


What makes you think a priest, who has studied religion as many years as a biology professor, does not know the answer to what is life as well as a biologist? You're both bouncing human ideas written by someone else around in your head, with much faith in your reading + life experiences, with goals of efficiency. Science is a belief, and most of science is theory and studies. And if you party with enough university researchers you know the execution is flawed, data is compiled by stoner grad students, most studies are based on unreplicated other studies data, but peer review(opinion) is good enough. And if a study is not good enough, well just lock it away for 75 years to avoid lawsuits. Likewise you have influence of special interests swaying the study questions to get the desired answers.

When you hail the Church of Science you're just going to get another crusade. History repeating.

I better get a biologist to identify my gender, otherwise a line will develop without the bioligist's expertise. What will we do? How will we survive without university certified educations. I identify as 108th trimester, somebody with a degree certify me please! Should we even think? Nah no need, the certified got this. Plumbers stahp, you don't have university degrees. HALT, you may not pass. If a priest didn't certify a marriage, or rabbi certify a circumcision, or a biologist didn't certify a birth, what will we do???

Maybe live life.

Science without humility is not science. That's just a belief system.
You're all sheep. Christ boy Ephesians is the same as University boy inkknife.
You take 3 months to read a textbook and christboy reads the bible every year.
I'm not impressed by either of you, with your trash cult opinions.
Member
Posts: 21,058
Joined: Jun 3 2019
Gold: 930.45
Warn: 10%
May 13 2022 09:15am
Conceive baby. Apply for disability on behalf of baby since it can't work on its own due to physical and mental impairment. Have an accident in eight months. Repeat. Free money baby.
Member
Posts: 61,687
Joined: Mar 14 2006
Gold: 28.77
May 13 2022 10:38am
Quote (DidNotKillSelf @ May 13 2022 08:08am)
I already know your place: you are a cultist, powerless but needy for control. All hail the church of science. No, no more sarcasm. My leader is not basic.

I see no difference between you and jamestown and waco, just less extreme, but same goofyness. Cult = little mini culture. Same same:
Trans is a cult. Maga is a cult. Culty televangelists. BLM is a cult. KKK is a cult. Gay parades are full of cultists, but gay does not equal cult. Unthinking sheep that walk into college for money and from cultural pressure thinking they have education instead of hebrew/judeo opinions are likely to be cultists. Because kids vulnerable to propaganda.

University kids are gullible. Easily manipulated. It's hilarity to ask opinions of a university student. You just expect comedy.

Don't you realize? You swallowed somebody else's ideas. Same as a catholic choir boy Ephesians.

But the university cult is superior, because institutions and ceremonies and certifications... wait... hmmm...?


What makes you think a priest, who has studied religion as many years as a biology professor, does not know the answer to what is life as well as a biologist? You're both bouncing human ideas written by someone else around in your head, with much faith in your reading + life experiences, with goals of efficiency. Science is a belief, and most of science is theory and studies. And if you party with enough university researchers you know the execution is flawed, data is compiled by stoner grad students, most studies are based on unreplicated other studies data, but peer review(opinion) is good enough. And if a study is not good enough, well just lock it away for 75 years to avoid lawsuits. Likewise you have influence of special interests swaying the study questions to get the desired answers.

When you hail the Church of Science you're just going to get another crusade. History repeating.

I better get a biologist to identify my gender, otherwise a line will develop without the bioligist's expertise. What will we do? How will we survive without university certified educations. I identify as 108th trimester, somebody with a degree certify me please! Should we even think? Nah no need, the certified got this. Plumbers stahp, you don't have university degrees. HALT, you may not pass. If a priest didn't certify a marriage, or rabbi certify a circumcision, or a biologist didn't certify a birth, what will we do???

Maybe live life.

Science without humility is not science. That's just a belief system.
You're all sheep. Christ boy Ephesians is the same as University boy inkknife.
You take 3 months to read a textbook and christboy reads the bible every year.
I'm not impressed by either of you, with your trash cult opinions.


Tells anarchist he has a need for control lol
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1789
Add Reply New Topic New Poll