d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Praise Ketanji
Prev1789101112Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 15,062
Joined: Sep 29 2021
Gold: 24.00
Feb 26 2022 03:15pm
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ Feb 26 2022 02:27pm)
I'm confused. I was told for literal years that as long as they satisfy the constitutional requirements then somebody is qualified. If she gets nominated and confirmed then by definition she is qualified. Seems there's several users here who aren't consistent on this issue.



Dude overcompensates for his racist past.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Feb 26 2022 03:19pm
Quote (cambovenzi @ Feb 26 2022 02:55pm)
You aren't intellectually qualified to interpret my comments or determine what is a strawman.
'x is bad'
'no y is bad.'
'you unambiguously said punk said y! strawman!'
no. idiot.


So you quoted somebody and then argued against a position they don't hold.

That is, by definition, a straw man. You literally just gave the definition of a straw-man without realizing it, while arguing you didn't. :rofl:

This post was edited by NetflixAdaptationWidow on Feb 26 2022 03:19pm
Member
Posts: 53,552
Joined: Mar 6 2008
Gold: 1,908.33
Feb 26 2022 03:20pm
Quote (Surfpunk @ Feb 26 2022 04:12pm)
Blah blah fucking blah. You're an NPC screaming into the void on a gaming website. Since moderation on this site sucks, and has for quite some time, I don't put much effort into posting here any more. It isn't worth it to argue with the mouth breathers that have plagued this sub for years.

I also never said she was a 'good judge' or a 'great pick'. Simply that A:) she has more qualifications than ACB did at her point of nomination, and B:) the idea that Jackson is unqualified for the bench is fucking stupid (and considering that federal judges swear an oath to uphold the Constitution before taking office, "the bench" = "uphold the Constitution" in this context). It's even more stupid when you consider that the Constitution has no prerequisites to be nominated to or to sit on the Supreme Court.


"blah blah your an NPC"

blatant anti-intellectual response to a clearly nuanced position

Scapegoating the mod team for your intellectual shortcomings is a pretty funny dodge.

I directly explained why your accusations that my position is ludicrous was wrong and why it is reasonable to criticize and oppose the pick.
You were wrong to make some shitty dig at me for opposing the pick and you were wrong to call me an NPC when I explained myself and refuted your positions.
Ironically its you who is backing out and refusing to intellectually engage. A coward that knows he is beaten and outmatched.
Member
Posts: 32,103
Joined: Dec 29 2009
Gold: 0.00
Feb 26 2022 03:24pm
Member
Posts: 31,996
Joined: Oct 25 2005
Gold: 3,863.50
Feb 26 2022 03:26pm
Quote (sirthom @ Feb 26 2022 11:52am)
I found her theme song, enjoy.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5RuCEhHcG4


Not surprised, you are a racist piece of shit.
Member
Posts: 53,552
Joined: Mar 6 2008
Gold: 1,908.33
Feb 26 2022 03:29pm
Quote (LouisLeGros @ Feb 26 2022 04:14pm)
Oh no my racist dog whistle actually wasn't racist because I'm actually such a partisan hack that I'd dismiss anyone who isn't a partisan conservative as unqualified. I'm totally not using affirmative action due to its long history of connection with dismissing minorities of ever being qualified.

Someone how I just don't buy that you'd be attacking a white male nominee as being unqualified and would just focus on them being liberal.


This is the state of the modern democrat.

'racist dogwhistle!"
How dare you oppose a democrat pick!
racist!
'partisan hack!'

They choose people for important positions based on race and gender and we are not supposed to call it out. Pointing it out is not racist.
I'm not going to give a free pass to a supreme court pick because of their race and gender. Refusing to do so does not make me a racist either.

Opposing a democrat pick doesn't make me a partisan conservative. I'm not even a conservative.
That is false binary thinking to emotionally justify your blind support of the democrats and any disgusting claims you want to make about people who disagree with them.
'othering' dissenters and calling them racist does not make you right.

Its entirely reasonable to oppose the democrats' supreme court pick.

This post was edited by cambovenzi on Feb 26 2022 03:29pm
Member
Posts: 12,978
Joined: Apr 28 2008
Gold: 6.66
Feb 26 2022 03:44pm
Quote (cambovenzi @ 26 Feb 2022 13:29)
This is the state of the modern democrat.

'racist dogwhistle!"
How dare you oppose a democrat pick!
racist!
'partisan hack!'

They choose people for important positions based on race and gender and we are not supposed to call it out. Pointing it out is not racist.
I'm not going to give a free pass to a supreme court pick because of their race and gender. Refusing to do so does not make me a racist either.

Opposing a democrat pick doesn't make me a partisan conservative. I'm not even a conservative.
That is false binary thinking to emotionally justify your blind support of the democrats and any disgusting claims you want to make about people who disagree with them.
'othering' dissenters and calling them racist does not make you right.

Its entirely reasonable to oppose the democrats' supreme court pick.


Asks why you don't just stick with opposing the pick because the pick is "liberal" instead of using racist dog whistles when we know there is no democrat nominee that you'd ever support. Proceeds to defend the racist dog whistle.

Oppose the democrat picks all you want, just don't see why you have to defend the racism so hard. No one is calling you racist for opposing a democrat nominated judicial nominee, that is expected behavior. Hell I mentioned earlier that I don't like Gorsuch and I certainly didn't approve of him being picked. However, I didn't attack him as being unqualified.
Member
Posts: 53,552
Joined: Mar 6 2008
Gold: 1,908.33
Feb 26 2022 03:47pm
Quote (LouisLeGros @ Feb 26 2022 04:44pm)
Asks why you don't just stick with opposing the pick because the pick is "liberal" instead of using racist dog whistles when we know there is no democrat nominee that you'd ever support. Proceeds to defend the racist dog whistle.

Oppose the democrat picks all you want, just don't see why you have to defend the racism so hard. No one is calling you racist for opposing a democrat nominated judicial nominee, that is expected behavior. Hell I mentioned earlier that I don't like Gorsuch and I certainly didn't approve of him being picked. However, I didn't attack him as being unqualified.


This is entirely pathetic and undeserving of respect on any level.

You should stop being so racist! yeah thats it. got em.
Member
Posts: 12,978
Joined: Apr 28 2008
Gold: 6.66
Feb 26 2022 03:51pm
Quote (cambovenzi @ 26 Feb 2022 13:47)
This is entirely pathetic and undeserving of respect on any level.

You should stop being so racist! yeah thats it. got em.


Attacks black women with long establish affirmative action racist dog whistle attack. Gets insulted by being called out on being racist. Takes ball and goes home.
Member
Posts: 23,970
Joined: Feb 28 2007
Gold: 35,554.14
Warn: 10%
Feb 26 2022 03:51pm
Quote (said_aouita @ Feb 26 2022 03:26pm)
Not surprised, you are a racist piece of shit.


You don't like John Lennon?
Strange, maybe you would prefer something you are more familiar with.



Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1789101112Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll