almost every single one of those points....


might as well be "i am not very smart" bingo honestly

So your defense to all of those very logical and sound points is: "you're dumb lawl"? Good job, you literally just showed that you have zero defense to my claims. Good day to you sir. I would say "good duel" but it was more of a slaughter.

This post was edited by net on Oct 11 2021 08:37pm

Maybe reading comprehension isn't your forte?

I got a medically unnecessary vaccine shot on top of having beaten the virus naturally. I still oppose vaccine mandates.

would it make your day if i did show you how ridiculously stupid that image was? some of the points are literally baseless claims that cannot be backed up by anything further than "just trust me bro"

Well, pro vaccine, against the vaccine, really it doesn't make much difference here in Canada, soon enough. You won't be allowed on a plane, majority of large employers require it, you cannot work for the federal gov't after November, you cannot work in any health care capacity. It will ultimately force the reaming people into getting it except a very very small faction.

The gov't is treating those that wont get it like the toddler tossing a hissy fit. You take enough stuff away the toddler eventually will do what its told to do. Like it or not that is just what is happening here.

You will still have likely a very small insignificant amount of people unvaccinated once you're essentially not allowed to move around anywhere but your home or via car but those people likely had little to no interaction with society anyway outside online personas so no loss there.

so your response to my statement is claiming i cant read? well that was fun bud good luck

as it should be

You can't *comprehend* what you read. There's a difference. You don't have to *force* people like me to get a vaccine, because being anti-mandate is not the same thing as being anti-vax.

Those points are literally very valid. It's okay. I hope you enjoy the side effects from the jab in the years to come. Good job!


Correct. Most people don't realize that.

This post was edited by net on Oct 11 2021 08:43pm

Speed something was made at has no bearing on its efficacy or safety.
We have hundreds of millions of people with these vaccines for nearly a year and no indication there's any long term effects.
Has been proven to slow spread including in variants, but not as effective in variants.
FDA approval has been given
So don't take the government's advice. The data is out there for you to examine yourself.
Very much necessary to prevent the collapse of the healthcare system and ensure the safety of those at greater risk. By this logic nothing is necessary.
Adverse events are not under-reported or unadvertised. They are taken incredibly seriously. The J&J vaccine was paused because of 6 events in over 6 million doses.
This one can be legitimate, but you should consult your doctor about it. I don't think there's any evidence that the vaccine exascerbates blood clots or stroke, and you aren't more likely to have a vaccine reaction unless you've had reactions in the past.
Natural immunity is inferior to natural immunity plus vaccination. More exposures = more effective immunity.
"Unfamiliar ingredients" applies to literally every piece of food you've ever eaten.
You are given informed consent. If you want the documentation you will have it.
The safe and effective preventatives are the vaccines. This one is just too rich. The only treatments are to support symptoms. Not great if you have a serious issue.
Basically no medicine manufacturer can be sued for injury or death. The safety data is always available.
So don't get a Moderna or J&J vaccine. There's like half a dozen available. Regardless, the history of making vaccines is irrelevant since, as supported above, side effects data is taken incredibly seriously.
The "criminal reputation" of a company is irrelevant to the safety or efficacy of the vaccine. Something they don't have a history of is just making up data to fabricate a treatment. That would get found out immediately.
Dozens of vaccines over the past thirty years haven't "fit the traditional definition of vaccine". This is just "new technology scary".
No vaccine optimizes for age, weight, or gender. It is not necessary.
So find one that doesn't have a conflict of interest. There's thousands of experts to choose from and all of them agree. The ones who don't agree tend to actually have conflicts of interests.
"Marketing too intense" has got to be the most brain dead argument I've ever heard.
There is no media censorship of opposing medical experts.
No suppression of social media reports either.
The "fetal cells" used in vaccine testing were taken 50 years ago and are used in the development of literally everything. Seriously, HEK293 cells are available in every lab for every treatment because they are such a robust cell line.
"I prayed about it" can justify literally any decision


The last one is literally the only one that is a legitimate argument. But nobody is forcing you to do anything so far.