280+ million americans are skeptical of high tech risky shift behaviors or conflict theory(coined conspiracy theory). The elite power structure is normalizing deviance through medical fraud & indoctrination. Sociology truth>medical lies:
Study culture to know the true cults & culprits:
https://ibb.co/PhJK1S2


Cat-parasite🍄 got your tongue?
doc-trines of devils, mark of the beast - mind controlled by parasitic yeast & digital tech. candida auris {hyphaeVirosa}, mycelium implants;
Shedding spikes proteins, the infected vaccinated - mrna mycelium vax tech.

This post was edited by lodd222 on Sep 11 2021 08:56am

Yes, but in the case of sushi rolls, people are making a voluntary decision to eat it. Any unknown risks there might be or might not be, it's theirs to take. But with the vaccines, there are also unknown risks, but people are being forced to take them.

Your "argument" is essentially this: yea sure, there are unknown risks in vaccines. But they also exist in a lot of other things too. Therefore, we get to make you take the vaccines.

Replace sushi with food.

Indeed people do shed dead cells naturally, but that doesn't mean you can now force them to hand over their dead cells to you by some sort of mandate or coercion.

If we go by your "logic", we can say, women get pregnant anyway. They do, indeed. Therefore, we get to rape them to make them pregnant. Hey, do women not get pregnant?

It's a matter of principle (which I do not expect you to understand). It's not about whether people's genetic material is "sacred" or not. But rather, my body, and anything on it, anything associated with it, is entirely mine and mine alone. Only I get to decide what to do with it. If you force me to hand over my cells, even though they are dead and it's something that is very easy to do, I can and should have the authority to tell you no. Why? Because it's my body and I have sole sovereignty over it.

Are you saying that you get to force people to take the vaccines because people already eat things that might have unknown risks?

Thank you sir. I too thought the first paragraph was the best. And to be honest I thought the letter was a bit too long. Also the stuff after the 1st paragraph is not religious anymore.

This is a Hobson's choice. You are forcing people to choose between their job or the jab.

It's kind of like, when a dictator says to his subjects, "you can choose to obey me, or death". Technically, this *is* a choice. However I am sure you will agree with me that there is truly only choice that people can make.

How does the submitter of this document not come off as pick and choosy in regards to where they're deciding to 'apply' their religion? Seems awfully convenient, and I think that is where this letter falls apart and doesn't come off as a legitimate religious reason, so I don't see how this can fall under religious protection/discrimination based on religion.

Especially when this isn't a steadfast rule of Christianity, as there are plenty of Christians getting the vaccine and that support vaccination.

Edit: My own counterpoint to my own above statements (from .gov link below). This might give it a leg to stand on, but its a gray area.


Here's an interesting article regarding other applications of HEK293.
https://www.patheos.com/blogs/throughcatholiclenses/2021/01/if-any-drug-tested-on-hek-293-is-immoral-goodbye-modern-medicine/.

So you're also saying you've never had a headache and taken Tylenol/Advil/Aspirin/Aleve, for religious reasons? It just isn't believable.


I am not a lawyer, but a quick google can show a US law perspective (YMMV in other countries) https://www.eeoc.gov/laws/guidance/section-12-religious-discrimination#:~:text=Title%20VII%20requires%20employers%20to,undue%20hardship%20on%20the%20employer.



This may trump all

This post was edited by penguinhero on Sep 11 2021 11:34am

Incorrect;
https://ibb.co/2n7tK6N[/url]

I like this line of thinking, because it highlights how capitalism has been tooled to screw everybody over. You have a choice between participating in capitalism or starving. There's basically nowhere else to go in the entire world. Now, that's not to say that means you have some inherent right to enforce your economic system on everybody else, but it is to say that the idea that capitalism allows choice is fundamentally false.