d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Mgtow 2021
Prev1789101183Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
May 14 2021 07:29pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ May 14 2021 08:12pm)
From the text in the caption, it's clear that what this chart measures is female perception of physical attractiveness. Luckily, all studies on the subject show that women place lower importance on the physical attractiveness of a prospective partner than men do.
Essentially, what this experiment was measuring was "does this pic get my juices flowing", and the beauty/hotness-threshold for that is just significantly higher for most women. This is not a modern phenomenon, it's always been like that.


Also really depends how the question is framed. If it's flat "sex appeal" then the graph isn't surprising. Women are less interested in looks, like you pointed out. Now, if it was phrased as "quintile sexiness" then he would have a point. Basically, 2.5 wouldn't be average in the former, so there's no sense saying a woman who's average rating was a 2 views "most men as below average".

This post was edited by Thor123422 on May 14 2021 07:29pm
Member
Posts: 33,925
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
May 14 2021 07:34pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ May 14 2021 09:12pm)
From the text in the caption, it's clear that what this chart measures is female perception of physical attractiveness. Luckily, all studies on the subject show that women place lower importance on the physical attractiveness of a prospective partner than men do.
Essentially, what this experiment was measuring was "does this pic get my juices flowing", and the beauty/hotness-threshold for that is just significantly higher for most women. This is not a modern phenomenon, it's always been like that.


Post those studies then.

The dating app statistics disprove your bullshit.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
May 14 2021 07:35pm
Quote (EndlessSky @ May 14 2021 08:34pm)
Post those studies then.

The dating app statistics disprove your bullshit.


There's your problem. You're citing dating app statistics instead of peer reviewed studies.

Although that's a more general issue with regards to your crap personality and status as a manlet.
Member
Posts: 33,925
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
May 14 2021 07:36pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ May 14 2021 09:35pm)
There's your problem. You're citing dating app statistics instead of peer reviewed studies.

Although that's a more general issue with regards to your crap personality and status as a manlet.


You sound mad.

Quote (Plaguefear @ May 14 2021 09:21pm)
I feel like this is a you problem, i don't even know any single people.


All of the women I grew up with are single with dogs and are turning 30 soon. Maybe 1% took the traditional route instead of pricing themselves too high and removing themselves from the dating market.

I think Sex and the City destroyed an entire generation of women.

Aussies are more attractive, taller, and thinner than Americans, you might just be better off over there.

This post was edited by EndlessSky on May 14 2021 07:36pm
Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 286.00
May 14 2021 07:44pm
Quote (EndlessSky @ May 14 2021 09:36pm)
You sound mad.



All of the women I grew up with are single with dogs and are turning 30 soon. Maybe 1% took the traditional route instead of pricing themselves too high and removing themselves from the dating market.

I think Sex and the City destroyed an entire generation of women.

Aussies are more attractive, taller, and thinner than Americans, you might just be better off over there.


You can be a twink instead of an incel, bro.
Member
Posts: 33,925
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
May 14 2021 08:06pm
Quote (Skinned @ May 14 2021 09:44pm)
You can be a twink instead of an incel, bro.


Reported.
Member
Posts: 54,147
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
May 14 2021 08:13pm
Quote (EndlessSky @ 15 May 2021 03:34)
Post those studies then.

The dating app statistics disprove your bullshit.


See this article and references therein:
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40806-016-0048-6

The abstract alone gives an excellent overview over all the seminal papers in evolutionary psychology. The tldr version is that men placing higher importance on looks and women placing higher importance on (socioeconomic) status is a well-established scientific fact. There are sound theoretical frameworks explaining why that is, and it's been confirmed empirically over and over again by actual scientific studies.

Your key fallacy is to think that dating apps were in any way shape or form representative of the larger dating market. They are not, they are characterized by an absurd gender ratio and steering disproportionate attention to superficial aspects like looks or a polished bio.





Now, one thing is for sure though: if some dude is low status/income, mediocre IQ at best, a manlet AND has a bitter personality, with frustration and misogyny seeping out of every conversation he's having, then that dude will be badly out of luck with the ladies - and that has nothing to do with girls "pricing themselves too high".

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on May 14 2021 08:14pm
Member
Posts: 33,925
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
May 14 2021 08:31pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ May 14 2021 10:13pm)
See this article and references therein:
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40806-016-0048-6

The abstract alone gives an excellent overview over all the seminal papers in evolutionary psychology. The tldr version is that men placing higher importance on looks and women placing higher importance on (socioeconomic) status is a well-established scientific fact. There are sound theoretical frameworks explaining why that is, and it's been confirmed empirically over and over again by actual scientific studies.

Your key fallacy is to think that dating apps were in any way shape or form representative of the larger dating market. They are not, they are characterized by an absurd gender ratio and steering disproportionate attention to superficial aspects like looks or a polished bio.





Now, one thing is for sure though: if some dude is low status/income, mediocre IQ at best, a manlet AND has a bitter personality, with frustration and misogyny seeping out of every conversation he's having, then that dude will be badly out of luck with the ladies - and that has nothing to do with girls "pricing themselves too high".


Are you even married? I forget.

You keep calling me names, so I'm just going to block you.
Member
Posts: 38,522
Joined: Apr 4 2006
Gold: 1,005.00
May 14 2021 08:43pm
Quote (EndlessSky @ May 14 2021 10:31pm)
Are you even married? I forget.

You keep calling me names, so I'm just going to block you.


Imagine threatening to block people here as if they seek validation from you. Stop thinking that you are systematically oppressed and settle with the ugly girls honestly. The problem is that you are a below average looking manlet with a standoffish personality, yet you yearn for the Kristi Noem's - it's just not feasible.
Member
Posts: 38,671
Joined: Apr 1 2007
Gold: 8.21
May 14 2021 08:49pm
Quote (kenw @ May 14 2021 07:43pm)
Imagine threatening to block people here as if they seek validation from you. Stop thinking that you are systematically oppressed and settle with the ugly girls honestly. The problem is that you are a below average looking manlet with a standoffish personality, yet you yearn for the Kristi Noem's - it's just not feasible.


Stop trying to be the #1 shit poster this is a place where facts and ideas are debated, not where personal insults are thrown in vain attempts to belittle others

Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1789101183Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll