d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Cuomo Vs Cruz
Prev17891011Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 286.00
Mar 5 2021 11:48am
So both are shitty but Cuomo in the lead.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Mar 5 2021 11:59am
Quote (Skinned @ Mar 5 2021 11:48am)
So both are shitty but Cuomo in the lead.


Whats up with the Cuomo sexual harassment stuff? Is it like Joe's personal space issues or was it actual assault?
Member
Posts: 33,927
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
Mar 5 2021 12:11pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ Mar 5 2021 12:59pm)
Whats up with the Cuomo sexual harassment stuff? Is it like Joe's personal space issues or was it actual assault?



Even a kiss on the lips wouldnt be assault. Just creepy as shit and typically fireable.

The coverup of the mass killings is far worse than anything else here.

If nothing wrong was done why cover it up?
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Mar 5 2021 12:16pm
Quote (EndlessSky @ Mar 5 2021 12:11pm)
Even a kiss on the lips wouldnt be assault. Just creepy as shit and typically fireable.

The coverup of the mass killings is far worse than anything else here.

If nothing wrong was done why cover it up?


Depending on the context, a kiss may or may not be sexual assault.

I was listening to some liberals describe how bad his accusations are, but the way they described it seemed like he just hadn't updated his 80's Italian mentality with the hugs and kisses and stuff on introduction.

So I'm kind of confused on what the big deal is? Like, that stuff is creepy but doesn't sound malicious or particularly harmful. More of a personal space issue that should have phased out on its own 10 or 20 years ago and now needs a series of HR meetings.
Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Mar 5 2021 12:19pm
How much lives could have been saved if Trump has been "pro masks" & social distancing ?
Was Cuomo "pro masks" ? YES
Was Ted Crus "pro masks" ? NO

Reading some more today about this story it seems clear that Cuomo made a little mistake by sending nursing home early recovered patients BUT there's a note here:

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/aug/24/michael-caputo/hhs-official-blames-cuomo-nursing-home-covid-death/
Though some epidemiologists and nursing home advocates questioned the report’s methods and findings, public health experts agreed with the report’s conclusion — based on the timeline — that nursing home staffers and visitors, before they were banned, were likely the main drivers of COVID-19 infection and death in nursing homes.
It was a mistake because it's possible to argue this decision caused the death of a few eldery people. I think he did that to free up some capacity in hospitals anyway. I see no financial or influence reasons.

Conclusion is that Cruz is definitely the worse, by far lol.
Member
Posts: 33,927
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
Mar 5 2021 01:07pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ Mar 5 2021 01:16pm)
Depending on the context, a kiss may or may not be sexual assault.

I was listening to some liberals describe how bad his accusations are, but the way they described it seemed like he just hadn't updated his 80's Italian mentality with the hugs and kisses and stuff on introduction.

So I'm kind of confused on what the big deal is? Like, that stuff is creepy but doesn't sound malicious or particularly harmful. More of a personal space issue that should have phased out on its own 10 or 20 years ago and now needs a series of HR meetings.


Zero self awareness holy shit. Proof that the metoo movement is a fraud.
Member
Posts: 53,368
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Mar 5 2021 03:04pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ 5 Mar 2021 13:16)
Depending on the context, a kiss may or may not be sexual assault.

I was listening to some liberals describe how bad his accusations are, but the way they described it seemed like he just hadn't updated his 80's Italian mentality with the hugs and kisses and stuff on introduction.

So I'm kind of confused on what the big deal is? Like, that stuff is creepy but doesn't sound malicious or particularly harmful. More of a personal space issue that should have phased out on its own 10 or 20 years ago and now needs a series of HR meetings.

it seems to be a lot of smoke to cover for his numerous mess ups in 2020. guys a creep regardless who got slapped hard by his Kennedy ex wife so hes trying to be a Kennedy now

one of them was him asking a subordinate if she would date an older man. not workplace appropriate but uhh, sexual assault..guess thats the law in NY if its sticking
Member
Posts: 34,649
Joined: Jul 2 2007
Gold: 273.37
Mar 5 2021 04:25pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ Mar 4 2021 11:50pm)
You are giving Trump the benefit of the doubt because "well, some libs might be for it because he's against it" while ignoring the overwhelming evidence showing his supporters strongly follow his lead, including his contradiction of medical authority, and making an opposite assumption of Cuomo.

In Cuomo's case, the first viable alternative anybody has shown me was only available a week after the order was in effect, and the order was only in effect after it was a serious problem. In other words, nursing homes were already screwed since a week with Covid patients early in the pandemic means your nursing home is infected.

In Trump's case, one group strongly follows his lead and the other somewhat goes against him but overwhelmingly trusts the medical authorities by comparison.

This isn't a hard calculation about who has more responsibility and who made easier to avoid mistakes, and the fact that you're making hyperbolic claims on Cuomo and saying it's a simple problem, but never made the same kind of criticisms of Trump, shows this is a partisan attack.


and it's also worth pointing out that this is a pattern. Nobody is calling you a partisan hack because of this one issue. Pretty much everybody has been pointing it out for years now lol


No, I am explaining that opposition to lockdowns is a much more complicated calculation than sending elderly to their deaths. Lockdowns collectively killed off millions of years in life expectancy, increased unemployment, alcohol consumption, stalled smoking declines, and have had serious consequences for mental health. If you can fairly calculate what those costs are, now and in the future, and compare them against covid-19 deaths, and then approximate and subtract out the impact that underlying causes had or didn't have, I'm more than happy to review it.

In Cuomo's case we can probably attribute at least a thousand deaths to his order. It is for Cuomo to explain, to the public's satisfaction, what alternatives he considered and why he rejected them. Instead he concealed the death counts and shifted the blamed to non-existent federal guidelines.

Stop using "everyone" as a stand-in for what you believe, it's weak.
Member
Posts: 54,177
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Mar 5 2021 04:29pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ 5 Mar 2021 18:23)
Trump going with the medical experts isn't him doing a good job. It's merely meeting the minimum expectation. It's like, if I show up and sit at my desk for 8 hours. I'm not going to win any awards, probably not even going to pass my first performance review, but at least I didn't make things worse. That's Trump wearing a mask and not actively contradicting his experts.

In actuality, Trump came, flirted with the secretary, made a nuisance of himself, messed up everybody else's work, and then left at noon.


I gotta disagree. The POTUS himself couldnt do too much in such a situation. The President's job basically involved only two tasks:

1. use the bully pulpit to lead the people, get them united behind a common goal/approach to the pandemic and to adopt the right behavior (wear marks, socially distance whenever feasible). Trump obviously failed horribly in this regard.
2. defer all the execution/the technical questions to the corresponding experts, provide them with funding and authority to carry out the necessary steps. Trump actually did this when it came to vaccine procurement, but he also undercut Fauci and the CDC.


Imagine Trump had held a couple of press conferences at the beginning of the pandemic where he walks on stage with his MAGA mask and then goes "wear masks and listen to Dr. Fauci, he's the man and has my full support. Dr. Fauci, take it away, I'm outta here", coupled with the vaccine procurement which he got right in RL anyway - he would have done something like 90-95% of the things he was able to do on the issue. Which is why it's so frustrating for someone like me who generally supported him: it was so so SOOOO fucking easy for him to get it right, but he just couldnt muster the miniscule amount of self-discipline and strategic thinking to do a "decent enough" job. :rolleyes:

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Mar 5 2021 04:30pm
Member
Posts: 54,177
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Mar 5 2021 04:48pm
Quote (fender @ 5 Mar 2021 10:56)
suggesting that mainstream media would still have criticised him does in NO way justify his politicising of the pandemic, and his anti-scientific approach.
his choice wasn't between 'making a reasonable decision, hoping to get credit from CNN - or do something that will kill tens of thousands of innocent people because CNN won't give me credit anyway', the choice was between 'listening to the experts and do the best you can to lead your country through a pandemic - or do what you think benefits you personally and politically, even if it means sacrificing countless lives' - and trump's choice was as clear and cynical and predictably devastating as it gets - not that a bootlicker like YOU would ever acknowledge that...


"Listen to the experts" has to be the most tired and misleading slogan of the past 10 years, if not longer. Experts are not a monolithic block, they actually do not agree on even the general strategy (elimination vs suppression) nor on some of the most consequential detail questions (e.g. how much open schools actually contribute to the spread). Just because there is consensus that masks should be worn (a consensus which btw did not exist yet at the onset of the pandemic), people should socially distance and the vulnerable should be protected does not mean that there is a singular, unified "expert opinion" that hands politicians a manual on how to get through the pandemic in optimal fashion.

Also, the "listen to the experts" slogan conveniently ignores that most experts can only tell politicians the "optimal" approach from the narrow perspective of their own field, while politicians have to keep the bigger picture and a host of complex tradeoffs in mind. If you ask epidemiologists about the optimal approach, they will tell you how to keep infection numbers as low as possible, because that's what "optimal" means in their field. What they cannot provide to decision-makers is the approach which minimizes the combined long-term total damage from covid and its effects plus the countermeasures and their side effects. In fact, this is such a complex question that no single expert in the world can give a comprehensive answer.


We can all agree that Trump's strategy was far from optimal, but opinions will already diverge a lot when it comes to exactly how bad it was. On a scale from 0 (Tanzania) to 100 (Taiwan), I think everyone can agree that Trump is below 60. But was his performance a 10, a 20 or perhaps a 40?

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Mar 5 2021 04:53pm
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev17891011Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll