Quote (Thor123422 @ Oct 29 2019 03:12pm)
You're right, it doesn't make them sexually ambiguous. It makes them sexless. So clearly pronouns were never based on the presence of genitalia.
In truth pronouns used to be based on a set of characteristics that society assigned as feminine. The idea that you waited to see somebody's dick before saying he/him proves that it was never based on dicks.
I mean.... unless you have some kind of headcanon that Winnie the Pooh has a concealed retractable penis.
you have an interesting relationship with time.....
english, and he/she by extension, are thousands of years older the Winnie the Pooh.
if we go back even further we see that almost 100% of art made by early civilizations had either exaggerated breasts or an exaggerated penis. so even before English our ancestors used a strict sexual binary, even their gods had sex.
in the case of Winnie, his penis isn't missing, it's implied. that's what the author calling him "he" meant.
around the time that "he" and "she" were created women and men were not similar in appearance. women wore loose shifts or dresses, men wore pants and tunics. you didn't need to see their junk to know what sex they were, that's basically the entire story of Mulan. everyone assumed that she was male because she dressed like it.
i can see how you'd be confused with thinking the pronoun was based on characteristics, rather than genitalia, if you're ignorant of the facts. in reality those characteristics were exclusive to those sexes, in the year 1,000 no men wore dresses (as a general rule).
it really is this simple, stick with me now, "he" historically has meant person with penis that shoots the sperm in the "she", which means person with vagina that can turn said sperm into a baby then feed it milk from "her" breasts. the terms were created directly to differentiate between the sexes, they were not created to refer to "person who wears dress". that's a correlation error in thinking it was causation.
edit: and this part is just silly:
Quote
The idea that you waited to see somebody's dick before saying he/him proves that it was never based on dicks.
the pronoun was created for the opposite reason, so you didnt have to see their genitalia to find out if you could mate with them.
i know you liberals like to hack up language but i didnt think history was on the docket this badly..... take an anthro class? lol
This post was edited by thesnipa on Oct 29 2019 02:26pm