was the debate before, during, or after you just called me an r-word a bunch then didnt answer any of the question i asked until goaded for 3-4 posts in a row? i just want to know where i should start tallying points from.

This post was edited by thesnipa on Jul 24 2019 12:55pm

Nobody reads that shit.



Which retarded question did I miss?

Man,

IceWizard has gone off the rails this thread......


Collusion Confirmed?

i'd categorize the question of what national security results would have made america safer as a question you can't answer more than an r-worded question.

we both know your support for this investigation was held up by Trump-hate more than expectations this would somehow make us more safe, then and now. especially now tho, since it proved fuckall.

but mostly you just showcased you arent really interested in a debate by strawmanning my 10 times in every post until you gave up.

This post was edited by thesnipa on Jul 24 2019 01:06pm

Collision concluded

I think I answered, which is understanding the way Russia interfered in 2016 is going to help us in our effort to prevent it from happening again. Protecting elections is a national security issue. It also seems relevant to know if a major foreign adversary has leverage over the President of the United States.

I disagree with your characterizations.

More interesting than this borefest testimony.

Someone confirm this is true ? (from moderated right paper)

Robert Mueller: "We will not say if President Trump has committed a crime"

"Did you actually totally exonerate the president?" Asked the president of the Judiciary Committee of the House of Representatives, Jerrold Nadler. "No," Mueller told him, reversing the comments of Donad Trump, who felt himself to be whitewashed by his report.

thanks you