Quote (Valhalls_Sun @ Sep 11 2015 02:33am)
What? what the tin foil hattery heck are you even saying at this point? It's not just specific theory on who the terrorists were. There was a through bi-partisan congressional investigation into who these terrorists were. There is no speculation or theory crafting.
The thing that you conspiracy nuts and truthers have to ask yourselves is; "to what end?" War? don't you think that there would be an easier way to galvanize our nation into action? Shoot down a helicopter overseas and kill a few Marines. That would have been enough to set our war machine into action. Create a coups in Iran or Iraq.etc... we always jump into those.
For all of his faults GWB. wasn't a traitor. he is a patriot who loves America, and gave eight years of his life up to lead her. I don't think he would be capable of signing off on a plan as terrible as you are suggesting. There is a difference between having a difference of political opinion and accusing the other side of that kind of domestic terrorism. The Republicans care just as much as the Democrats do about America, we each just have different opinions of how we'd like to get stuff done. But neither side is capable of slaughtering over two thousand of it's own people there are too many true heroes on both sides that would stop a plan like that. This is real life not a Clancy novel.
I'm not accusing anyone of anything, I'm just saying that it's entirely possible that it was an inside job--and not that it definitely was. I'm not a republican or a democrat, I think the political dichotomy is ridiculous.
The fact that there are so many heroes that would stop it doesn't matter if only 5 people knew about the plan...
As for the extensive investigation, have you ever heard of the Halabja chemical attack? It was an act of genocide by Saddam Hussein against the Kurds, while Saddam was still an American asset. The entire world concluded that Saddam was responsible, except America. Canada, for instance, condemned it as a crime against humanity be Hussein's regime. The US state department, DIA and CIA investigated and concluded that the attack was carried out by Iran, which was very clearly not the case. Saddam's cousin "Chemical Ali" was eventually put to death, after Saddam, based on evidence of his involvement in the Halabja attack. There is even evidence that American officials knew for a fact that it was Saddam who was carrying out these chemical attacks against innocent people, and still helped him in the war against Iran.
http://foreignpolicy.com/2013/08/26/exclusive-cia-files-prove-america-helped-saddam-as-he-gassed-iran/It doesn't matter how great an investigation is if the cover-up is simple and conducted intelligently, the CIA is very capable of doing so, and history has shown that they're willing to kill American citizens in false flag operations to get American support for wars, so what is your argument? Do you think the CIA is unwilling or unable to do something like this?
You're right, this isn't a Tom Clancy book--I don't think you really realize that though. It's not a battle between good and evil, it's far more complicated than that. Good people are entirely capable of doing terrible things when they think the good outweighs the bad.