Quote (thundercock @ Oct 18 2014 11:45am)
Simple criteria: Can the current system be exploited? The answer is undoubtedly yes.
You know, the Heartbleed bug wasn't exploited en masse either. That doesn't mean it shouldn't have been fixed.
But the reality is that the system isn't being exploited in the manner that people who support the more suppression-esque ID laws are alleging. That's simply a fact. It can't rationally be denied at this point. Everyone outside the bubble is willing to concede this because millions of dollars have been spent at the local, state, and federal levels on investigating elections only to find that this is nowhere even remotely close to a systemic, regularly-occuring problem. You fix the system and improve its efficiency and integrity by pursuing reforms that go in literally the exact opposite direction that this does. Voter impersonation simply isn't happening in this country at a noticeable level so instituting voter ID isn't the way to solve the potential problem. These laws and the way they're being implemented clearly create more problems than they solve, and that's largely because the problem they were allegedly created to solve doesn't actually exist.
All of this of course ignores the fact that they're being implemented in an unethical way in most states, as noted in Skinned's post where states allow certain IDs used predominantly by certain demographics while not allowing other IDs used predominantly by other demographics. It's beyond clear why these laws are being pushed: a major political party that has existed in this country for 150 years could soon be on its death bed, and rather than adapting in an equitable and respectable manner the way the parties have adapted before they are just using every desperate ploy that's stashed away deep in their playbook to avoid having to account for population growth and demographic change.