d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Immigration And Culture
Prev1789101118Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 112,095
Joined: Jul 25 2008
Gold: 40.42
May 14 2010 05:33pm
Quote (narcisso @ 14 May 2010 18:28)
There is no ethnicity called Macedonian. It's like someone wanting to be Prussian. There was an area called Prussia, it was an actual country until 1925 but i've never heard of anyone saying "i feel Prussian, create a place where i can express that in my own way". This whole thing happens because Greece doesn't have the means and/or the intelligence to close this matter once and for all.


If that was the case, then they wouldn't be trying so hard to destroy the language and culture of Macedonians by renaming them to "Slavophone Grecians" and refusing to let them name their children what they want or speak their language.

If that culture didn't exist, the Greeks wouldn't need to work so hard to destroy it. Subtle cultural genocide, and the EU needs to give them a spanking over it, imo.
Member
Posts: 6,563
Joined: Sep 20 2009
Gold: 21,728.00
May 14 2010 06:31pm
Quote (AiNedeSpelCzech @ 15 May 2010 02:33)
If that was the case, then they wouldn't be trying so hard to destroy the language and culture of Macedonians by renaming them to "Slavophone Grecians" and refusing to let them name their children what they want or speak their language.

If that culture didn't exist, the Greeks wouldn't need to work so hard to destroy it.  Subtle cultural genocide, and the EU needs to give them a spanking over it, imo.


The problem doesn't come from their existence. We know these people exist and treat them already in a special way. The problem occurs when they try to create a country called Macedonia when Macedonia is already a place in Greece. It's like Austria wanting to be named Bavaria because many people feel bavarians. It doesn't make any sense...
Member
Posts: 112,095
Joined: Jul 25 2008
Gold: 40.42
May 14 2010 07:16pm
Quote (narcisso @ 14 May 2010 19:31)
The problem doesn't come from their existence. We know these people exist and treat them already in a special way. The problem occurs when they try to create a country called Macedonia when Macedonia is already a place in Greece. It's like Austria wanting to be named Bavaria because many people feel bavarians. It doesn't make any sense...


If "Treating them special" means "Not letting them have their language, their customs, or their names passed down through generations" then sure. Super special.
Member
Posts: 12,201
Joined: Feb 13 2010
Gold: 14.88
May 14 2010 07:32pm
Quote (AiNedeSpelCzech @ May 14 2010 05:16pm)
If "Treating them special" means "Not letting them have their language, their customs, or their names passed down through generations" then sure.  Super special.


I don't think the State has the power to combat these cultural forces brought about by the incumbent majority.
Member
Posts: 28,331
Joined: Jun 9 2007
Gold: 11,700.00
May 14 2010 08:38pm
Quote (narcisso @ 14 May 2010 23:28)
There is no ethnicity called Macedonian. It's like someone wanting to be Prussian. There was an area called Prussia, it was an actual country until 1925 but i've never heard of anyone saying "i feel Prussian, create a place where i can express that in my own way". This whole thing happens because Greece doesn't have the means and/or the intelligence to close this matter once and for all.


you picked a very bad example here
prussia as is seen today was a german state (independent till the end of wwi, ie 1919, as kingdom of prussia with the king of prussia being emperor of the german empire and a state within the weimar republic for a few more years) but it was/is actually the margravate of brandenburg, (the original) prussia was outside the borders of the holy roman empire (and it's population has a totally different ethniticy [they were/are a baltic people actually]) but after the margrave of brandenburg became king of prussia he prefered to use that title because king is ranked higher than margrave - a situation similar to austria which was an archduchy in itself and the archduke was emperor due to the fact that he was also king of bohemia and hungary
and if you read up on (ancient) greek history you will notice that prior to philip ii the greek states looked down on their 'barbaric' cousins, the macedonians, from whom they tried to distance themselves
hope that clarifies the issue a bit for you

PS btw, due to invasion and occupation (especially after the napoleonic wars) prussia at the end covered an area containing a lot of different german 'ethnicities' and a few others as well but none of the area originally occupied by the prussian people

This post was edited by brmv on May 14 2010 08:49pm
Member
Posts: 112,095
Joined: Jul 25 2008
Gold: 40.42
May 14 2010 09:29pm
Quote (PlasmaSnake101 @ 14 May 2010 20:32)
I don't think the State has the power to combat these cultural forces brought about by the incumbent majority.


The state is intentionally reinforcing those cultural forces. It's laws that prevent Macedonian names and language from being carried on by Macedonians.

I'm not saying they need statehood immediately for things to be fair, but ffs.
Member
Posts: 9,350
Joined: Apr 12 2006
Gold: 3.07
May 14 2010 10:37pm
Quote (bogie160 @ May 2 2010 11:51pm)
Nations survive and thrive on common culture and identity. America protects itself from decay by promoting a cult-like support for the Constitution. This is not bad, on the contrary it is quite good, it allows our nation to protect the very rights it was founded on.

Immigration is both the bane and the life of this system. It allows the influx of new blood necessary to prevent decline, but it does not force that new blood to have the same respect for culture that native citizens have propagandized into them. Here enters the need for restriction on immigration, tests on knowledge of American history, civics, etc.

I want a compromise, there isn't any need for either racism or self-hatred, let in immigrants regardless of race or ethnicity, but only take those with an actual interest in assimilating to American culture.


Oh, if only the Americans had enforced this policy in 1492...

This post was edited by Inviction on May 14 2010 11:03pm
Member
Posts: 9,350
Joined: Apr 12 2006
Gold: 3.07
May 14 2010 10:49pm
Quote (catkaboodle @ May 2 2010 11:58pm)
I know many US citizens who would wholeheartedly agree with you.

However, I am not sure that assimilation is entirely necessary. Sure, people should know the language(English!), but I think that if Americans are exposed to different cultural perspectives, it can help them deal with citizens of other countries as well.


Why must current immigrants know English when the first immigrants did not need to know Cherokee or Navajo?

And why do some frown upon Spanish when the Spanish were the first Europeans to discover the New World?

Quote (AiNedeSpelCzech @ May 14 2010 01:04pm)
I don't see that as justifying trying to obliterate their language and culture entirely, sorry.  :(

The thing is that there's already a Turkey for people who feel Turkish.  There's no Macedonia for people who feel Macedonian.


On the contrary, a "Macedonia for people who feel Macedonian" exists. It is called Macedonia.

Quote (AiNedeSpelCzech @ May 14 2010 06:33pm)
If that was the case, then they wouldn't be trying so hard to destroy the language and culture of Macedonians by renaming them to "Slavophone Grecians" and refusing to let them name their children what they want or speak their language.

If that culture didn't exist, the Greeks wouldn't need to work so hard to destroy it.  Subtle cultural genocide, and the EU needs to give them a spanking over it, imo.


You are confusing the Slavic Macedonians with the Greek Macedonians. The Macedonian language is official in Macedonia, while the Ancient Macedonian language, the language of Alexander, was a Hellenic language that was eventually replaced by Koine Greek. The two share the same name because they originate from the same region on the northern border of Greece.

I must commend you, though. Using emoticons to give your tenuous arguments an appeal to pathos is a clever trick that works well on the feeble-minded, but honestly, why are you trying to split up nations and rewrite history when you clearly have no background on the subject?

Greek Macedonian culture exists, just as Spartan and Athenian cultures existed and exist. Regardless, they are all Greek. Since the modern nation-state, as opposed to ancient city-states, stresses linguistic and ethnic unity, one would expect Greece to stress the commonalities of being Greek rather than the differences between being Macedonian or Spartan or Athenian or Thracian or Corinthian or Cretan, but this is by no means "cultural genocide" against Macedon or Athens or Sparta or Thrace or Corinth or Crete. To say that Macedon is not Greek is to suggest that Greece break up into separate city-states again.

Is California any less American because its culture has Hispanic elements and many Hispanophones live there while the much of the rest of the United States is Anglophone?

This post was edited by Inviction on May 14 2010 11:12pm
Member
Posts: 9,350
Joined: Apr 12 2006
Gold: 3.07
May 14 2010 11:13pm
Quote (bogie160 @ May 2 2010 11:55pm)
Euro-trash, get the fuck out.


Now imagine if that had been said to some ancestor of yours after he had just alighted from the boat...

O tempora o mores!

This post was edited by Inviction on May 14 2010 11:16pm
Member
Posts: 34,649
Joined: Jul 2 2007
Gold: 273.37
May 14 2010 11:17pm
Quote (Inviction @ May 15 2010 05:13am)
Now imagine if that had been said to some ancestor of yours after he had just alighted from the boat...


I would expect my ancestor to have killed the offending vermin.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1789101118Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll