Neither of these are remotely true and are just ways for intellectually bankrupt people to try to attach labels to their political rivals as if their only thought process is primitive word association of me good enemy bad.
Left vs Right are not ideological divisions, they are political affiliations. Full stop.
Let me repeat that because I've only said it about 100 times prior on PARD, Left vs Right are not ideological divisions, they are political affiliations.

The people you affiliate with, those you vote for and support and who support you, are your political alignment in the left vs right world. This goes all the way back to the origins of national assembly in the french revolution, where disparate groups came together and literally sat on the left vs right side of the hotel des menus-plaisirs; loyalists versus revolutionaries. It didn't matter what particular ideological streaks drove them to side with or against Louis XVI, only that they had to take a side and they did.

The democratic party and republican party are the American iterations of left vs right, coalitions of disparate groups with a wide range of ideology and often friction between opposed groups inside their tent. The republicans have embraced a broader swathe of the electorate, taking on libertarians, neocons, civil libertarians, small business, big business, evangelicals, etc. The democratic party has become more insular with purity tests, yet still overlooks the fact they somehow try to simultaneously include southern baptists, islamists, greens, transgender activists and neoliberals even though some of these factions want to murder other factions they vote alongside.

Islamists remain attached to the democratic party. For now, and not too firmly. Muslims in the most regressive areas voted overwhelmingly for Joe Biden the first time around, but many broke with him in 2024 and it was a big part of costing him the election. They are a tenuous bloc, overwhelmingly still aligned more leftwing than rightwing and more likely to make a protest vote for Jill Stein than sidew ith Trump. There is potential they could fully break and join the right, but it hasn't happened, not yet, and unlikely in the future. But in the past, they've been between 90-100% aligned with the leftwing. Indeed, one of the far-left factions. The areas ruled by the muslim vote are uniformly democratic, terrorist attacks have been carried out by groups of far-left radicals in new jersey for example.

The ADL is about as much of a right-wing organization as Obama is a white nationalist. Jonathan Greenblatt turns left harder than a japanese zero

Jonathan Greenblatt is a Democrat Zionist shill. He has no political leaning. He, like many other Democrats, are right-wing Zionists who are beholden to Israel. Not America.

You cannot debate these facts because you are insanely brainwashed into thinking everything "bad" is "left". Just because Muslims voted for Democrats doesn't mean ANYTHING. You realize the Democrats are a right-wing death cult? If you're going to bring up political ideology in terms of right versus left, at least be accurate.

You can easily say the Democrats are just left to the Republicans, which is of course true. But you cannot at the same time say something as insane as Black Israelites, Islamists, and Zionists are somehow "the left". You know it's untrue. You know they're ideologically right-wing. You just don't like they aren't Christian Nationalists. That's what it's all about at the day.

Are they a minority? Ok well if they aren't a Christian Nationalist then they're obviously THE LEFT.

Pretty much every single Tesla owner is a brain-rotted liberal. Why Elon Musk decided to take the Republican/MAGA grift I will never understand.

Baby brained liberal is okay with destroying entire villages in the middle east. But oh no we can't have some spray paint on my luxury items. That's going too far. That's VANDALISM.

If you voted for the Democrats after all their war-mongering since Clinton and haven't learned yet? Honestly, I don't feel bad for him.

Again, because you didn't seem to understand this despite me submitting it as an opera libretto and putting it to full orchestral score: Left vs right are not ideological divisions. They are political affiliations.
Demographics can hold divergent and even mutually contradictory sets of ideologies and yet be aligned politically, because that's what a political party is, a coalition. There's no coherent ideology to the left or right, because they aren't ideological divisions. There is however a clear and obvious political affiliation when muslims and transgender activists both vote uniformly for democrats at every level of government. They don't have to share a room, just share a ticket.


Hey wait I've got a follow up
this is an extra addendum added by future time traveler goomshill. This is me, writing from about an hour from now when I otherwise would have written this reply to your next comment, where I once again explain how left vs right are political not ideological divisions. I didn't like having to write it three times in a row (in this time frame, which hasn't occurred yet as of you reading this post). So I added it here instead, again

They don't share a room. They do share a ticket. However, the party itself, the people who make the decisions and those who fund those who make those decisions are ideologically right-wing. American propaganda has done a lot of damage to you, I understand that much. But the "left" you speak of is completely disenfranchised and this is because of this very reason. The Democrats have successfully co-opted "the left" and are branded as such by Republicans and news media but it's just that.. propaganda. It's in every elite's best interest to make us believe we have a left-wing option. The same goes for the Republicans. It serves both parties and their LITERAL shared room elites.

Is it really any coincidence that Trump was so close to the Democratic politicians before he really began his true career in politics? He helped (and partied) with the Clintons, he said many praises of the Democrats back before Obama was elected. He knows how to play the game. He knew a silver-spoon billionaire wouldn't have a chance on the Democratic ticket because it's just ideologically left enough to make it impossible. You need a more nuanced approach. Like Biden or Harris.

So within the Democrats you have liberals who are convinced they're somehow against a police state.. voting for a literal cop war-monger.

And within the Republicans you have a silver-spoon-fed never worked a hard day in his life liberal elite pretending to be on the Average Joe's side.

Because maybe, after you get your fuck-off money x1 000 000 anyway, you start to think about other things in life.

Bill Gates thinks about force-vaxxing people and population control and Elon Musk thinks about free speech and colonizing Mars.

They’re not all the same.

I think you nailed the issue at hand.

It’s ultimately about feeling good about oneself and ones own actions. People don’t want complex analysis and empathy is very hard. Much easier to have a scapegoat. An easy target that will not defend itself and one can justify his or her own missteps and deficiencies through “fighting evil incarnate”.

Societies are tribal. It’s very hard to be contrarian and stand firm for what you believe. Much easier to fall in line and go with the flow. Easier to avoid responsibility if you “were just following orders” and “did what everybody else did”.