d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Antivaxxers Win?
Prev1789101112Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 3,044
Joined: Nov 24 2016
Gold: 4,818.00
Warn: 10%
Mar 4 2025 10:59am
You want to force people to take the medicine, even though you admit it won't even always work. And any potential side effects are on them.

Aaaand... you have to believe in the 97% effectiveness, even though it's the same people who told you that covid vaccines are safe and effective.

What if somebody doesn't believe this number, because he thinks there is too much big pharma corruption (which there is)? Or thinks there might be some side effects because of specific other illness he might have? Or if he just doesn't want you to inject a foreign substance into his body because it's his body and his choice? :)


Hm interesting so people shouldn't be imposed to arbitrary law. Like what if I drive over an imaginary line and decide to live in an imaginary square. I think it's my right as a person to live where I please as long as I contribute fairly.

I don't believe in this imaginary line, so naturally I should be able to do this and no government should be able to force me to leave, yes?
Member
Posts: 3,044
Joined: Nov 24 2016
Gold: 4,818.00
Warn: 10%
Mar 4 2025 11:03am
I think I agree. Abolish borders. Abolish vaccinate mandates. But do not spread misinformation.

As long as you are consistent I can agree with you. If you do not agree on abolishing borders then you're a hypocrite and need to shut up.
Member
Posts: 92,900
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Mar 4 2025 11:07am
You want to force people to take the medicine, even though you admit it won't even always work. And any potential side effects are on them.

Aaaand... you have to believe in the 97% effectiveness, even though it's the same people who told you that covid vaccines are safe and effective.

What if somebody doesn't believe this number, because he thinks there is too much big pharma corruption (which there is)? Or thinks there might be some side effects because of specific other illness he might have? Or if he just doesn't want you to inject a foreign substance into his body because it's his body and his choice? :)

Btw. I am not against vaccines (well, the normal ones anyway). I just don't think people should be forced to take them.


"i'm not against the normal ones", you mean like *checks notes* the measles vaccine? what an odd post.

anyways, no i dont want to force anyone to do it arbitrarily. if they wish to enter our country that is a request, requests have contingents. same for use of public schools, you can always choose a private school, or home school. to go a step further i'd be fine with the govt paying for it, the measles vaccine isn't expensive, its very old, and not developed by the same people as the c19 mnra shots, it was introduced in 1971. its about 25$ per dose, 2 doses for 50$ total, last a lifetime. or at least long enough to grow out of the risk category into adulthood where its exceedingly rare to be fatal. 50$ per child in a school is like 1 book. you dont seem to know much about the mmr vaccines but have a lot of opinions.



The US kids, or rather their parents are already forced. The only way to bypass vaccination requirements is homeschooling or finding a private school that doesn't also enforce vaccine requirements. When it comes to the MMR, I don't know of many private schools that don't require it.

The fact that foreign children are exempt from what is mandated against US Citizens is completely insane, and NOBODY can provide a valid reason why that's how it is. US Citizens quite literally pay for those schools with our property tax dollars. Don't own property? You still pay rent, and your rent goes up with every increase to property taxes. Property taxes literally exist to pay for public schools.

Yet your kids can't attend public school AT ALL if they do not get their MMRs.

Foreign children? Exempt. It's wild how we treat foreigners, especially the illegal kind, with so much reverence that we're willing to put over ten million of our own citizens, including our own children at risk to cater to them.


i agree entirely.
Member
Posts: 18,157
Joined: Jan 8 2022
Gold: 22,843.67
Mar 4 2025 01:17pm
Hm interesting so people shouldn't be imposed to arbitrary law. Like what if I drive over an imaginary line and decide to live in an imaginary square. I think it's my right as a person to live where I please as long as I contribute fairly.

I don't believe in this imaginary line, so naturally I should be able to do this and no government should be able to force me to leave, yes?

You really thing it’s the same thing? :)

"i'm not against the normal ones", you mean like *checks notes* the measles vaccine? what an odd post.

anyways, no i dont want to force anyone to do it arbitrarily. if they wish to enter our country that is a request, requests have contingents. same for use of public schools, you can always choose a private school, or home school. to go a step further i'd be fine with the govt paying for it, the measles vaccine isn't expensive, its very old, and not developed by the same people as the c19 mnra shots, it was introduced in 1971. its about 25$ per dose, 2 doses for 50$ total, last a lifetime. or at least long enough to grow out of the risk category into adulthood where its exceedingly rare to be fatal. 50$ per child in a school is like 1 book. you dont seem to know much about the mmr vaccines but have a lot of opinions.





i agree entirely.

If it’s so well tested and so effective then surely people would volunteer to take it. So, no laws needed?
Member
Posts: 92,900
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Mar 4 2025 02:31pm
You really thing it’s the same thing? :)


If it’s so well tested and so effective then surely people would volunteer to take it. So, no laws needed?


90.8% Of people do, per google. your inability to stay on topic and need to shift goalposts has been noted. glad to add another person to the too dishonest to engage with list.
Member
Posts: 18,157
Joined: Jan 8 2022
Gold: 22,843.67
Mar 4 2025 02:55pm
90.8% Of people do, per google. your inability to stay on topic and need to shift goalposts has been noted. glad to add another person to the too dishonest to engage with list.


Lol

Name calling and ad personam arguments begin :)

This post was edited by kayko on Mar 4 2025 02:55pm
Member
Posts: 25,139
Joined: Dec 20 2006
Gold: 82,014.68
Warn: 10%
Mar 4 2025 03:00pm
You want to force people to take the medicine, even though you admit it won't even always work. And any potential side effects are on them.

Aaaand... you have to believe in the 97% effectiveness, even though it's the same people who told you that covid vaccines are safe and effective.

What if somebody doesn't believe this number, because he thinks there is too much big pharma corruption (which there is)? Or thinks there might be some side effects because of specific other illness he might have? Or if he just doesn't want you to inject a foreign substance into his body because it's his body and his choice? :)

Btw. I am not against vaccines (well, the normal ones anyway). I just don't think people should be forced to take them.


the satanists are/were exploiting the constitutional right to a doctor - forcing one to visit and thusly get vaccinated.



the obvious correct interpretation is right or choice vs involuntarily forced. no sane person thinks a doctor forcing you against your will is the correct interpretation of a right to a doctor and corresponding vaccination.

the world was involuntarily forced in many ways because if you did not drive to get one, they made sure you got it in other ways.
they made sure you could not work or were fired and unless you obeyed those "doctors orders"' you could not buy food from stores
aka forced mask wearing in order to obtain food.


it was a global agenda to microchip in addition hence the global chip shortages and thusly increase in graphics cards values among other things as silicon valley overclocked in producing biochips for billions of vaccines
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020%E2%80%932023_global_chip_shortage
Member
Posts: 8,944
Joined: Jun 19 2006
Gold: 687.30
Mar 5 2025 04:20am
the satanists are/were exploiting the constitutional right to a doctor - forcingone to visit and thusly get vaccinated.

https://i.ibb.co/PGnJ1KJN/forcedjabbings.png

the obvious correct interpretation is right or choice vs involuntarily forced. no sane person thinks a doctor forcing you against your will is the correct interpretation of a right to a doctor and corresponding vaccination.

the world was involuntarily forced in many ways because if you did not drive to get one, they made sure you got it in other ways.
they made sure you could not work or were fired and unless you obeyed those "doctors orders"' you could not buy food from stores
aka forced mask wearing in order to obtain food.


it was aglobal agenda to microchip in addition hence the global chip shortages and thusly increase in graphics cards values among other things as silicon valley overclocked in producing biochips for billions of vaccines
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020%E2%80%932023_global_chip_shortage


The wiki article notably does not say that the global chip shortage was due to chips being in the vaccine, mostly because that is an absolute deranged claim
Member
Posts: 78,723
Joined: Nov 30 2008
Gold: 493.00
Mar 5 2025 06:10am
Member
Posts: 31,925
Joined: Sep 21 2007
Gold: 1,126.00
Mar 5 2025 10:26am
Any trust I had in the pharmaceutical business went down the shitter with how they acted with covid, specifically the requirement of people to get the vaccine that were already sick with covid. We literally refrain from giving the vaccines to people born before 1957 because they have likely already been exposed to measles back then, but here they used 0 logic with covid.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1789101112Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll