Quote (ScionCapital @ 15 Oct 2024 18:06)
I'm saying if you're god, and you designed the human body and decided it was perfect. You are most definitely a flawed being.
Quote (ScionCapital @ 15 Oct 2024 20:55)
Sorry buddy, i appreciate your interest in this matter. But I cannot accept the world you that you purport to be true. I really wish I could. I would much prefer a paradise in the clouds, but my mind does not work off that preference.
It's funny to me your entire perceptual awareness of what people around the world call "God/god" is just the "Abrahamic version" it's why your entire list consists of almost exclusively "Abrahamic faiths".
When an atheist gives the whole spiel of "God doesn't exist" or that there's not a "paradise in the clouds" he is not negating anything more then the FACT that a "physical God is not in the clouds(heaven) judging the deeds of all beings. Common logic tells you there isn't physically a dude up there and no being is coming back from the dead(Jesus or other) at least not physically he was clearly talking about the "soul" or what people call the "essence of existence".
The definition of God varies drastically across all religions and philosophies you only speaking on the "Patriarchal masculine God of the bible" shows your ignorance on the subject.
The whole reason I studied the East was because I thought all the "fairy tale stories" were bullshit i.e not based in reality and I wanted to see how other "religions" worked/functioned and what was their "god".
Buddhism developed 600 years before Christ lived. Hinduism a few THOUSAND before Christ(arguably the oldest and "mother of all religions"). Religion didn't start when Jesus died on the cross. It was very much alive and well for thousands of years prior to his death. The only reason you and everyone else in this thread exclusively talks about the "Abrahamic faiths" because they were the religion who conquered peoples and forced them to believe in their God. The Hindus and Buddhist "NEVER" thought to "spread their ideology" through violence.
This is where those ideologies just dominate the Abrahamic faiths. If you read anything related to Hinduism/Buddhism and other Eastern philosophies they stand alone very far away and with much more "logical/scientific" approaches to "understanding existenc itself". For every question a human being may have the Buddhist/Hindus gave 100 different potential answers that fit for different people. The Abrahamic faiths foolishly tell everyone that "their way is the only way.
Only through Christ. Only through Allah. Only through Yahweh. Only through Jehova. That is the root of their ignorance. Saying they have exclusive ownership of the "truth" because their "idol" is the "idol of idols". Every Buddhist/Hindu will sort of laugh at that aspect.
They(Hindus/Buddhist) spent hundreds of years/thousand giving the most in-depth "answer" to that question "What is religion" "Who is God" "What is God" "What is our purpose" "Why/When/How/What/etc. yet the Abrahamic faiths said "fuck you wealth of knowledge that makes our books look retarded" &&& so they murdered/killed all non-believers and attempted to convert everyone else.
The most intolerant body of religions is the Abrahamic religious body as their stories are all intertwined. Some would say Islam the most intolerant of them. I'd agree.
What's funny to me is I was raised Catholic but when I studied Hinduism/Buddhism/etc. I immediately saw the "gaping holes" in my own religion. Having more atheistic/agnostic tendencies going into it I decided to go "all the way" and study until I couldn't. I actually wanted to see/feel/experience God because up until that point in my life I didn't get it. After 10 years of studying basically bits and parts of many different ideologies I realized they were all just different stories explaining the human experience in different symbols/metaphors/stories.etc.
I typed this out to help you understand that you can be born into a religion(Catholic) question it(Atheism/Agnosticism) look for answers in the only other places(Eastern religion/philosophy) and then come to different conclusions about the same questions.
You asked the wrong question so I gave you the RIGHT answer.