Of course it is condemned. There's no discourse to be had around that though.

If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it’s probably a duck. Unless you’re under the delusion that if it identifies as a polar bear, it’s not actually a duck.

I believe you. It only took you 13 posts after all.

No they are not. You are just offended that a majority of LGBTQ+ have a history of mental illness.

Guess when the mental illness worsens? When the individual makes a decision against their own biological nature because society promotes it as if it's a "solution" to their underlying condition, "Gender dysphoria".

One of my best friends is an openly gay man do you want to know the reason? He was over 350 lbs and couldn't get a girlfriend so he "went gay". Nothing wrong with that.

My cousin who is on his way to becoming a doctor is an openly gay man and do you want to know the reason? He's a genius and my uncle was homophobic. Nothing wrong with that.

Homosexual feelings go back to ancient Greece and further. It is still biologically against human nature. 2 men 2 woman cannot reproduce they can only adopt.

I have asked them the hard questions because I love them?

I've gone with both of them to "Pride Events" and both of them "openly gay" our ENTIRELY against the "tranny indoctrination of children". Both admit that they'd probably be straight if they weren't born into a rich 1st world country.

Do you want me to pull out the DSM manual?

Any gay/trans person I met was for the most part "unhappy" unless they were doing a bunch of drugs amongst gay/trans peers?

Nothing wrong with gay/trans people but when a majority are "unhappy" and feel "unloved" they go and do something like this. Shoot up a church because God said a penis goes in a vagina?

This post was edited by SwamiVivekananda on Feb 12 2024 09:32pm

Forgive me for not taking the time to state the obvious, I suppose?



Not at all. I'm pointing out that people are ignorant about mental health, in a literal sense. I believe the only other PaRD user aside from myself who has any level of education, training, and license in the matter is Skinned.

Yes I think I'd you have a criminal record and recorded mental health issues you should be denied a gun.

Your comment is honestly so fucking dumb bro.

i'm talking more specifically about the claim around licensing/training/certification which makes me think about bridges given my background.

an expert signed off on this bridge saying nothing was wrong with it. it's not that i don't like the bridge, bridge's just aren't supposed to swing like that.

And given that I'm not a civil engineer, I wouldn't make specific, categorical claims about the matter. Y'all mistake deviance for mental illness.

So if I got arrested for smoking pot at a park when I was 14 and had a voluntary stay for depression, I should lose my 2nd amendment rights under the constitution?
Owning a firearm is a constitutionally guaranteed personal right, and it cannot be taken away on grounds less than what it takes to imprison someone.
If society knows that a person poses an unacceptable risk to the public and has committed crimes that merit imprisonment, they should simply be imprisoned, and they can't buy a gun in prison.
If society doesn't know the risk posed by someone, but simply has warning signs and red flags like mental illness, they cannot have their constitutional rights stripped for a pre-crime they haven't yet committed any more than we can imprison them preemptively.

Of course, what I'm talking is just basic logic, and today's theme is to reject logic and embrace appeals to authority, so I'm sure there's an anti-gun group spokesman's quote about how science has proven the need to ban guns from folks after an unappealable court order with no due process

You're being a complete clown. The individual had a record of arrests as in repeated offences and a mental health record including mental health emergency.

Clearly you can have degrees of things that would and would not impact your ability. Perhaps minor drug possession does not but being a repeat offender and having a history of significant mental health issues does.

It's not rocket science and you sound like an absolute idiot.

This post was edited by SBD on Feb 12 2024 09:43pm

My oh my, how did we get along for millennia without someone showing us a piece of paper telling you why their point of view is valid and no one else’s is.

Thank God some are endowed with enough common sense to realize a concrete structure moving like that is precarious and they don’t have to wait for a structural engineer to come tell them to stay away, they just stay away…Almost as if non experts can also pick up on the observable world and form right opinions based on other reference points.