d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > The American Right Is A Terrorist Organization
Prev1789101118Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 19,240
Joined: Oct 23 2003
Gold: 7,104.95
Jun 6 2023 05:02pm
Quote (Hamsterbaby @ Jun 6 2023 12:58pm)
Wow charges dropped

Question, why always elderly and woman ?

https://i.imgur.com/EBKbxD0l.jpg


charges dropped because the victim asked for restorative justice instead of incarceration...whats your point here?
Member
Posts: 45,718
Joined: Aug 25 2008
Gold: 40,130.00
Jun 6 2023 05:12pm
Quote (gnarjay @ 7 Jun 2023 07:02)
charges dropped because the victim asked for restorative justice instead of incarceration...whats your point here?


Why always beat up woman and elderly.
Member
Posts: 19,240
Joined: Oct 23 2003
Gold: 7,104.95
Jun 6 2023 05:27pm
Quote (Hamsterbaby @ Jun 6 2023 04:12pm)
Why always beat up woman and elderly.


theyre easy targets for bullies unfortunately
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Jun 6 2023 05:45pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Jun 6 2023 02:46pm)
tldr: "It's (D)ifferent".

Your stance isn't principled or consistent, it's self-righteous. Different sides disagreeing on the merit, severity and urgency of issues is the very core of politics. Postulating that your own side's perspective is the universal, undeniable truth, that the issue your sides cares about are objectively important while the other side's issues are objectively illegitimate, is not a sufficient justification to endorse political violence. It boils down to "I am right and you are wrong, and because I am right, I'm justified in bashing your head in if you disagree or resist".


Just to be clear, I could literally use this argument to condemn Jews defending themselves in Nazi Germany. You know that right?

The position you laid out here is that literally nobody can ever be right about anything, because somebody else disagrees that their rights are legitimate.

I just think you should think about that. You've been making a lot of arguments lately that would literally defend Hitler.
Member
Posts: 25,139
Joined: Dec 20 2006
Gold: 82,014.68
Warn: 10%
Jun 7 2023 03:58pm
Quote (Crunkt @ Jun 6 2023 12:33pm)
you really should stop reading bitchute articles its not good for your health


https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/jun/06/whistleblower-ufo-alien-tech-spacecraft?w
Member
Posts: 54,102
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Jun 7 2023 09:32pm
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ 6 Jun 2023 21:49)
Nah, it's literally just looking at the facts presented.

I get when you do that it's uncomfortable but you have to do it.


Blacks are undeniably still oppressed and murdered by police in America.

Trans people are a tiny minority oppressing basically nobody and the entire issue is a blatant fabrication in contrast to best medical practices.

Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ 7 Jun 2023 01:45)
Just to be clear, I could literally use this argument to condemn Jews defending themselves in Nazi Germany. You know that right?

The position you laid out here is that literally nobody can ever be right about anything, because somebody else disagrees that their rights are legitimate.

I just think you should think about that. You've been making a lot of arguments lately that would literally defend Hitler.

I did not claim that violence is never justified. Direct self-defense is an obvious exception. Furthermore, I don't even claim that there exist no circumstances under which political violence could ever be legitimate. All I said was that one side declaring their talking points to be the universal truth is not a sufficient justification for violence. In this specific case, there is no broad consensus on the existence of "systemic racism" (at least not in the way the contemporary lefty discourse understands it), and you will have a hard time arguing that peaceful approaches had already been exhausted by the time the BLM riots broke out.

Case in point: I would argue that Democrats' win in 2020 would have been larger if the Floyd protests had remained peaceful throughout. The looting, violence and the imagery of burning buildings allowed Trump and the GOP to muddy the waters on an issue on which the left/Democrats/black people initially had the undeniable moral high ground. They succeeded in making public opinion on BLM ultimately fall along the usual partisan lines, which imho allowed them to avoid electoral disaster. Without "fiery but mostly peaceful", chances are that you get a Dem majority post-2020 in which Biden has the votes to enact far more of the Democratic agenda.

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Jun 7 2023 09:34pm
Member
Posts: 45,718
Joined: Aug 25 2008
Gold: 40,130.00
Jun 7 2023 09:36pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ 8 Jun 2023 11:32)
I did not claim that violence is never justified. Direct self-defense is an obvious exception. Furthermore, I don't even claim that there exist no circumstances under which political violence could ever be legitimate. All I said was that one side declaring their talking points to be the universal truth is not a sufficient justification for violence. In this specific case, there is no broad agreement on the existence of "systemic racism" (at least not in the way the contemporary lefty discourse understands it), and you will have a hard time arguing that peaceful approaches had already been exhausted by the time the BLM riots broke out.

Case in point: I would argue that Democrats' win in 2020 would have been larger if the Floyd protests had remained peaceful throughout. The looting, violence and the imagery of burning buildings allowed Trump and the GOP to muddy the waters on an issue on which the left/Democrats/black people initially had the undeniable moral high ground. They succeeded in making public opinion on BLM ultimately fall along the usual partisan lines, which imho allowed them to avoid electoral disaster. Without "fiery but mostly peaceful", chances are that you get a Dem majority post-2020 in which Biden has the votes to enact far more of the Democratic agenda.



Member
Posts: 54,102
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Jun 7 2023 09:43pm
Quote (Hamsterbaby @ 8 Jun 2023 05:36)


Floyd was a piece of shit, but he still didn't deserve to die. Chauvin's actions were an egregious violation of a police officer's duty of care.
Member
Posts: 46,978
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
Jun 7 2023 09:50pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Jun 7 2023 08:43pm)
Floyd was a piece of shit, but he still didn't deserve to die. Chauvin's actions were an egregious violation of a police officer's duty of care.


every one said it was bad. then the left turned it into a race issue.
Member
Posts: 45,718
Joined: Aug 25 2008
Gold: 40,130.00
Jun 7 2023 09:52pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ 8 Jun 2023 11:43)
Floyd was a piece of shit, but he still didn't deserve to die. Chauvin's actions were an egregious violation of a police officer's duty of care.


American police have very very little training before they get into service.

they went from 8 warning shots to 68 warning shots

This post was edited by Hamsterbaby on Jun 7 2023 09:52pm
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1789101118Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll